Conspiracy Revelation: 26.6.2019: Warmongerers unmasked…who profits the most in partaking in evil and unnecessary wars…
„Who benefits the most if there was a war?
11 of the 20 companies are in USA..
20. Textron
• Country: United States
19. Naval Group
• Country: France
18. Leidos
• Country: United States
17. Rolls-Royce
• Country: United Kingdom
16. Honeywell International
• Country: United States
15. United Shipbuilding Corp.
• Country: Russia
14. United Aircraft Corp.
• Country: Russia
13. Huntington Ingalls Industries
• Country: United States
12. L-3 Technologies
• Country: United States
11. United Technologies Corp.
• Country: United States
10. Almaz-Antey
• Country: Russia
9. Leonardo
• Country: Italy
8. Thales
• Country: France
7. Airbus Group
• Country: Trans-European
6. General Dynamics Corp.
• Country: United States
5. Northrop Grumman Corp.
• Country: United States
4. BAE Systems
• Country: United Kingdom
3. Raytheon
• Country: United States
2. Boeing
• Country: United States
1. Lockheed Martin Corp.
• Country: United States
Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/02/21/military-spending-defense-contractors-profiting-from-war-weapons-sales/39092315/?fbclid=IwAR1efopWb9JqFQJlFGZhtCIM_FpMb1Y9RNcby2Hmo-aD2gMwaf2nw9FM3Vk“
Kategorie: Multitoxifikation/Umwelt
-
US military is a bigger polluter than as many as 140 countries – shrinking this war machine is a must

„US military is a bigger polluter than as many as 140 countries – shrinking this war machine is a must“
„The US military’s carbon bootprint is enormous. Like corporate supply chains, it relies upon an extensive global network of container ships, trucks and cargo planes to supply its operations with everything from bombs to humanitarian aid and hydrocarbon fuels. Our new study calculated the contribution of this vast infrastructure to climate change.
Greenhouse gas emission accounting usually focuses on how much energy and fuel civilians use. But recent work, including our own, shows that the US military is one of the largest polluters in history, consuming more liquid fuels and emitting more climate-changing gases than most medium-sized countries. If the US military were a country, its fuel usage alone would make it the 47th largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, sitting between Peru and Portugal.
In 2017, the US military bought about 269,230 barrels of oil a day and emitted more than 25,000 kilotonnes of carbon dioxide by burning those fuels. The US Air Force purchased US$4.9 billion worth of fuel, and the navy US$2.8 billion, followed by the army at US$947m and the Marines at US$36m.
A US Navy warship refuelling off the coast of California. Jason Orender/Shutterstock
It’s no coincidence that US military emissions tend to be overlooked in climate change studies. It’s very difficult to get consistent data from the Pentagon and across US government departments. In fact, the United States insisted on an exemption for reporting military emissions in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. This loophole was closed by the Paris Accord, but with the Trump administration due to withdraw from the accord in 2020, this gap will will return.
Our study is based on data retrieved from multiple Freedom of Information Act requests to the US Defense Logistics Agency, the massive bureaucratic agency tasked with managing the US military’s supply chains, including its hydrocarbon fuel purchases and distribution.
The US military has long understood that it isn’t immune from the potential consequences of climate change – recognising it as a “threat multiplier” that can exacerbate other risks. Many, though not all, military bases have been preparing for climate change impacts like sea level rise. Nor has the military ignored its own contribution to the problem. As we have previously shown, the military has invested in developing alternative energy sources like biofuels, but these comprise only a tiny fraction of spending on fuels.
The American military’s climate policy remains contradictory. There have been attempts to “green” aspects of its operations by increasing renewable electricity generation on bases, but it remains the single largest institutional consumer of hydrocarbons in the world. It has also locked itself into hydrocarbon-based weapons systems for years to come, by depending on existing aircraft and warships for open-ended operations.
Environmentalists should argue for going beyond simply ‘greening’ military infrastructure.
Not green, but less, military
…the US military’s carbon bootprint must be addressed in domestic policy and international climate treaties.
Our study shows that action on climate change demands shuttering vast sections of the military machine. There are few activities on Earth as environmentally catastrophic as waging war. Significant reductions to the Pentagon’s budget and shrinking its capacity to wage war would cause a huge drop in demand from the biggest consumer of liquid fuels in the world.
It does no good tinkering around the edges of the war machine’s environmental impact. The money spent procuring and distributing fuel across the US empire could instead be spent as a peace dividend, helping to fund a Green New Deal in whatever form it might take. There are no shortage of policy priorities that could use a funding bump. Any of these options would be better than fuelling one of the largest military forces in history.“
https://theconversation.com/us-military-is-a-bigger-polluter-than-as-many-as-140-countries-shrinking-this-war-machine-is-a-must-119269 -
The tiny Welsh car that runs on hydrogen and emits only water
„The tiny Welsh car that runs on hydrogen and emits only water“
„(CNN)Riversimple, a small independent car manufacturer in rural Wales, is taking a bet that hydrogen vehicles will play a key part in the future of transport.
Former auto engineer Hugo Spowers swore off working with petrol engines 15 years ago when he began toying with the idea of building hydrogen-powered vehicles.
Spowers was determined to devise a fundamentally new solution to address the problems associated with carbon emissions.
„We’ve got to move beyond trying to make combustion engines a little bit less bad,“ he tells CNN. „Because after all, being a little bit less unsustainable is still not sustainable.“
The result is a hand-built, aerodynamic car called Rasa that weighs just 580 kilograms — 40 kilograms more than just the battery of a Tesla Model S.
Its name comes from the Latin „tabula rasa,“ which means „clean slate,“ a nod to the clean hydrogen technology and how Spowers and his team designed a radically different type of car from scratch.
The Rasa chassis is made from lightweight carbon fiber monocoque.
The odd-looking two-seater with butterfly doors takes three minutes to refuel, has a 500 kilometer range, a top speed of 96km/hour, and the only tail pipe emission is water.
By comparison, a battery electric vehicle takes much longer to recharge and can run flat after 250 kilometers for cars like the Nissan Leaf or 550 kilometers for the latest Tesla Model S.
The Rasa has a motor in each of its four wheels, powered by hydrogen running through a fuel cell. When the hydrogen combines with oxygen it produces electricity to power the motors, as well as water as a byproduct.
The car also has its own „super capacitors“ to capture kinetic energy from braking as electricity, and convert it into power to assist with acceleration.“
„The Rasa’s hydrogen fuel cell produces 8.5 kW of electrical power.
Creating a market
Early next year Riversimple will trial 20 Rasa vehicles in Monmouthshire, a county in south east Wales. The idea is to have a single hydrogen filling station in Abergavenny, a central town in the area.
„We’re trying to create a movement to bring this to market at a local level,“ says Spowers. „You can create a market for a car with just a single filling station.“
The Rasa is designed to be used as a runabout within a 40-kilometer radius, and Spowers estimates the average driver would typically re-fuel once a week.
However, Riversimple doesn’t intend to sell its cars. Instead, it is promoting a „sale of service“ model where, much like a cell phone contract, the customer pays a monthly fee for the car, maintenance, insurance and fuel, at roughly the same cost of ownership as a Volkswagen Golf.
But don’t expect to see hydrogen cars popping up all over the place just yet.
The biggest barriers for hydrogen cars include a lack of infrastructure and an enthusiasm for battery electric vehicles, according to automotive journalist and clean-tech enthusiast Richard Sutton.
„Until the refueling infrastructure exists for hydrogen, then it will always be a bit part player compared to battery electric,“ says Sutton. „But that’s set to change.“
These AIRPod One prototypes are powered by compressed air, driven by joystick, and can be refilled like a gasoline car at compressed air stations. <br /><br />Plans for the AIRPod, created by Guy Negre (pictured) head of MDI, have been in the works for two decades, and it is expected to be on the market later this year.
Photos: Air, algae and other alternative fuels
Air – These AIRPod One prototypes are powered by compressed air, driven by joystick, and can be refilled like a gasoline car at compressed air stations.“
„Chocolate and vegetable oil: This British-built World First Formula 3 racing car has a biodiesel engine configured to run on fuel derived from chocolate and vegetable oil. The bodywork, steering wheel and seats are made from various vegetable fibers mixed with resin. The racing car is 95% biodegradable and can still do 200 km/h around corners. It was unveiled by researchers from Warwick University in 2009.“
„The racing car is 95% biodegradable and can still do 200 km/h around corners. It was unveiled by researchers from Warwick University in 2009.
Hide Caption Beer – New Zealand became the first country in the world to fuel cars using yeast left over from brewing beer in 2015.“ The biofuel, called Brewtroluem, is made by a brewery in New Zealand called DB Export.“
The biofuel, called Brewtroluem, is made by a brewery in New Zealand called DB Export.
Solar – While you won’t find many commercial solar cars on the road, people have been building their own models — and racing them — since 1987.
Teams from across the globe compete in the World Solar Challenge – a 3,000 km solar-powered vehicle race between Darwin and Adelaide.
When gasoline imports ceased in Senegal in the 1940s, people had to improvise. Pictured here are two Senegalese men stoking a charcoal-burning automobile called the „Gas-o-gene“; in 1942.
…Charcoal.
Liquid nitrogen – This liquid nitrogen-powered vehicle has an insulated tank to hold the liquid nitrogen and two fans at the rear of the vehicle that draw air through heat exchangers. Once the high-pressure nitrogen reaches room temperature it drives a piston engine in the front of the vehicle.
It was built at the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the University of Washington in 1997.
The Ye Zi, or Leaf, concept car is fitted with solar panels on the roof, while tiny wind turbines on the wheels top up its batteries. The experimental Chinese car looks like a praying mantis on wheels and was developed by Shanghai Automotive Group Co in 2010. It hasn´t made it beyond the concept stage. Wind.
Hybrid – When it comes to clean technology, hybrid cars currently rule the roads. Gasoline-electric hybrid cars rely on both a gas engine and a battery to provide power, whereas others require a plug in every now and then to reboot. Toyota leads sales, with more than 10 million Lexus and Toyota hybrid vehicles sold worldwide according to the company.
Electric – Electric cars are ramping up production with more than 2 million electric cars on the road globally in 2016, and over 750,000 units sold over the year, according to the Global EV Outlook 2017 report.
This modified Toyota Prius — known as The Algaeus — runs on electricity and biofuels made from algae.
Algae – Algae are small aquatic organisms that produce energy from carbon dioxide and sunlight and store it in the form of oil. This can be converted into biodiesel.
Air – These AIRPod One prototypes are powered by compressed air, driven by joystick, and can be refilled like a gasoline car at compressed air stations. Plans for the AIRPod, created by Guy Negre (pictured) head of MDI, have been in the works for two decades, and it is expected to be on the market later this year.
Photos: Air, algae and other alternative fuels
Plans for the AIRPod, created by Guy Negre (pictured) head of MDI, have been in the works for two decades, and it is expected to be on the market later this year.
A Dutch car, Nuna 9, ..won the race this year, traveling at an average speed of 81.2kmh.
Alternatively fueled vehicles – There’s a lot of buzz around electric, hybrid, and hydrogen cars at the moment…
Hydrogen – While hydrogen fuel cell technology continues to develop, there are only approximately 7,000 hydrogen fuel cell vehicles on the roads, according to the Hydrogen Council. This figure is expected to reach 10,000 by early 2018; Three popular models include the Toyota Mirai (pictured,) Hyundai Tucson FCEV and Honda Clarity.
Photos: Air, algae and other alternative fuels
…
In the UK, the government permits drivers to make 2,500 liters per year without paying duty. Cooking oil – Another popular fuel, biodiesel, is made by combining almost any oil or fat — from rapseed and canola oil to animal fats or recycled restaurant grease — with an alcohol such as ethanol or methanol.
Ethanol – Ethanol (alcohol) can be made from biomass such as corn or sugarcane, or non-food material such as switchgrass, wood chips or municipal waste.
The United States is the world’s top ethanol fuel producer with 15,329 millions of gallons produced in 2016, followed by Brazil with 7,295 millions of gallons. Most cars in Brazil are built to run on both petrol and sugarcane-based ethanol.
..
There are currently fewer than 300 refueling stations around the world, according to the Hydrogen Council, a global advocacy group of energy, transport and industrial companies.
Globally there are only about 7,000 hydrogen fuel cell vehicles on the road, compared to an estimated 2 million electric vehicles, as per the Global EV Outlook 2017 report.
„We will soon reach 10,000 hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles deployed worldwide, which is still relatively small numbers, but we need to realize that two years ago we were still talking about 300 vehicles,“ says Air Liquide and Hydrogen Council representative Erwin Penfornis.
Japan is the biggest market for hydrogen cars, and is home to just under 100 hydrogen filling stations.
But production is limited, even for big commercial players like Toyota. The company produces approximately 3,000 hydrogen-powered Mirai cars each year, according to Toyota Group manager Jean-Yves Jault.
The Toyota Mirai, pictured at a hydrogen station in Tokyo, has a range of 650 kilometers.
„If a company like Toyota brings something like this to market it’s kind of a signal to the energy companies and governments who have to make the investments into the infrastructure to start doing so,“ Jault tells CNN. …
While Toyota is currently selling and leasing its Mirai in a way that reflects what the market can absorb, it intends to ramp up production to 30,000 units by 2020. …
Despite hydrogen cars having zero tailpipe emissions, hydrogen production is energy intensive.
Currently, most hydrogen is extracted from methane, which, when exposed to high-temperature steam, separates into hydrogen and carbon monoxide while producing a small amount of carbon dioxide.
But even taking into account hydrogen production… What’s more, both Spowers and Jault agree that hydrogen cars will prove to be the most attractive „clean“ alternative for the average driver.
„It [hydrogen] is the only technology that can deliver the convenience, range, refueling time that we’re used to with a conventional car today,“ says Spowers.
That doesn’t mean hydrogen is the only solution. Jault foresees an array of zero emission vehicles on the road by 2030.
„We still believe that hydrogen will be a very strong solution for decarbonizing transport in the future,“ says Jault. „Not the only solution, but a very promising one.““
Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/15/world/riversimple-hydrogen-cars-wales/index.html -
How the Pentagon’s Forever Wars Are Killing the Planet
Conspiracy Revelation: 22.6.2019: And all that to keep their fake NWO-Oil-Cartel-Retardation-Truman-Show-Loop alive…INSANE…STOP THEM!!! FOREVER!!! To save the World!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Release all classified free energy technology to the public.
Conspiracy Revelation: 22.6.2019: If people will be unable…Sophia and Theo will wipe them away and move them into a quarantine prison planet millions of light years away..

„How the Pentagon’s Forever Wars Are Killing the Planet“
„It’s been a harrowing couple of weeks for climate change observers. First, as Vice reported, there was an analysis from an Australian think tank, co-written by Ian Dunlop, a former fossil fuel company CEO, that posits that the planet is “reaching a ‘point of no return’ by mid-century, in which the prospect of a largely uninhabitable Earth leads to the breakdown of nations and the international order.’ ”
Then, on Wednesday, Brown University released a report revealing that the Department of Defense is “the world’s largest institutional user of petroleum and correspondingly, the single largest producer of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the world.” According to the report, the DOD released approximately 1.2 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, between 2001 and 2017.
Burning diesel and jet fuel for troop and weapons transport and usage causes 70% of the emissions, the report said.
In other words, the same institution that has kept America at war since 2001 is not only killing people, but also the planet. As CNBC pointed out, “The findings showed that if the Pentagon was listed as a country, its emissions would make it the world’s 55th largest contributor of greenhouse gases”—bigger than Portugal or Sweden.
CNBC called the report “the first of its kind to compile such comprehensive data.”
The Pentagon’s energy use was fairly stable from 1975 to 1990, and declined after the Cold War. Then came 9/11 and fighting in Afghanistan. After that, researcher Neta Crawford writes, “energy consumption by the DOD increased, and in 2005 hit its highest level in a decade. Since 2001 the DOD has consistently consumed between 77 and 80 percent of all US government energy consumption.”
“Unlike other elements of the current US administration,” she writes, the DOD acknowledges that climate change is an ongoing and dire issue. Crawford says that the department has made some improvements in terms of fossil fuel emissions, “[emphasizing] what it calls energy security — energy resilience and conservation” in its operations. Still, the agency remains a significant consumer of fossil fuel energy,” and ”there is room for much steeper cuts” to its carbon emissions and energy consumption.
Among Crawford’s suggestions for making those cuts are designing equipment with greater fuel economy, switching to alternative fuels, restructuring training, base closures, and reducing military operations worldwide.
If the DOD doesn’t cut its emissions and fuel consumption, Crawford warns that the consequences will be dire:
Absent any change in US military fuel use policy, the fuel consumption of the US military will necessarily continue to generate high levels of greenhouse gases. These greenhouse gases, combined with other US emissions, will help guarantee the nightmare scenarios that the military predicts and that many climate scientists say are possible.“
Source: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/how-the-pentagons-forever-wars-are-killing-the-planet/
