https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFI4pEgEKvA
„Underworld Reptilian Caverns That Exist Deep Beneath The Earths Surface“
„Okay, the Brooklands report said two things: first of all that it was bad for a lower civilization, it is devastating for a lower civilization to come in contact with a higher civilization, because eventually things change and it’s not always better, but this was emphasized very heavily in
the report the other one was is that they said that science and industry specifically science and engineering the fields of science and engineering would actually be the most hard, hardest impacted groups out of the entire human society, that means all of these guys that run area 51, all these scientists, all these engineers, they’re afraid they may not have a job, when the ET arrives, okay, they’re being professionally protected, they’re are worried, because like the childhoods end , has anybody read, okay, one person, two people in here, did you guys you know arthur c clarke okay did you know his very first book was about reptilian humanoids coming to earth and claiming this planet is not their own and did you know and the in front of his book he writes down that the ideas presented in this book or not those of the author, I’m just saying, I’m just saying, you know and he worked with RAND Corporation and he had all these other privileged positions to be able to speak to scientists and people in the government.“
„that was a social move that would devastate us economically across the board especially their fields now there’s a lot of other people they’re still gonna go to work because they need
to pay their paychecks but these guys were worried about their jobs not us okay let’s make that real clear we have narcissists running the intelligence communities in the science
and engineering communities at the very top and their
protective professionaly over their own call for their own colleagues so unless they can wrap it it’s almost like saying:
all you smart guys aren’t so smart anymore, we got the really smart guys coming down and they don’t like that, so what would it do to their world of science well it basically turned it
upside down they wouldn’t know where to go next and they’re saying just as the childhoods end the book says that coming
into contact with the higher civilization is not always good because it creates a lull in humanity it makes us kind of depressed because they said that if you’re given all the
technologies and all your questions are suddenly answered the pressures of and evolution as a society stop because all everything’s here what are we all going to do when
they decide that they’re going to tell everybody about extraterrestrial life..they’re afraid of all these questions that we have that drive us forward to progress
ourselves as a society will end and this is the threat that they’ve held over us, so the ramifications for public
disclosure, I’ve been out there for a number of years doing my talks, but darka is the main agency that runs over everything. Did you know in the last since like I think and I’m gonna misquote this I’m gonna rough it something like between 1996 and 2002 DARPA changed its name no more than four to five times , okay, everybody was catching on with the Internet, they were
afraid that if people started thinking: I’m not going to use the internet, because actually it was created by the Defense Department DARPA, they started dropping the D off and just having ARPA and then the next year they added the D back on and then two years later they took the D off, these guys
couldn’t figure out if they wanted to tell the public that ARPA was really.. a defense intelligence agency that would air all their technologies that were made are are the technologies
of being employed in our current space fleets and yes I do say skirt space fleet. so I believe that we have them. run by the Navy and these are the guys that really are the ones that you have to be careful of this also respect, because they hold all the all the keys, so with pressures, let’s talk a little
bit about what happens to you as a speaker, what happens to you when you start coming across novel information that may be posing a threat as far as the government’s concerned to our
society by telling people things they don’t want them to hear and the TV shows would it surprise you to know that a lot
of television shows will have things happen with the men in black and they won’t report it to the public okay.“
„UAMN TV
Am 28.05.2019 veröffentlicht
John has wide knowledge of Secret Underground Bases and the advanced tunneling technologies used to create them. He will give us a clear view into the secret government and “alien” underworlds that exist beneath our feet. In this vein, John will tell us about the early history of tunnel building under Los Angeles, and the South Bay, in connection with the aerospace industry. During that time, and thereafter, they moved their most sensitive facilities underground, sometimes under gated communities where the companies housed their scientists. Could the tunnels under LA be extensions of early Chinese tunnels, or part of a network of tunnels that may have been built by the Lizard People of Hopi Legend? Rhodes will tell us what the Hopi say about the Lizard People and the “Ant People,” which are said to appear when the world is about to be cyclically cleansed?
Finally, John will introduce us to the Reptoids 64 key “All is Light” message, which was revealed to a group of humans by alien intelligence. Deciphering the message led Rhodes to explore an ancient and secret numerical sequence–which is found in the game of chess, at the root of many biological forms found in nature and which is deeply embedded in the core of our Digital Age technologies. Did aliens introduce us to this profoundly significant mathematical sequence–and if so, for what purpose?“
Kategorie: Protection
-
US military is a bigger polluter than as many as 140 countries – shrinking this war machine is a must

„US military is a bigger polluter than as many as 140 countries – shrinking this war machine is a must“
„The US military’s carbon bootprint is enormous. Like corporate supply chains, it relies upon an extensive global network of container ships, trucks and cargo planes to supply its operations with everything from bombs to humanitarian aid and hydrocarbon fuels. Our new study calculated the contribution of this vast infrastructure to climate change.
Greenhouse gas emission accounting usually focuses on how much energy and fuel civilians use. But recent work, including our own, shows that the US military is one of the largest polluters in history, consuming more liquid fuels and emitting more climate-changing gases than most medium-sized countries. If the US military were a country, its fuel usage alone would make it the 47th largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, sitting between Peru and Portugal.
In 2017, the US military bought about 269,230 barrels of oil a day and emitted more than 25,000 kilotonnes of carbon dioxide by burning those fuels. The US Air Force purchased US$4.9 billion worth of fuel, and the navy US$2.8 billion, followed by the army at US$947m and the Marines at US$36m.
A US Navy warship refuelling off the coast of California. Jason Orender/Shutterstock
It’s no coincidence that US military emissions tend to be overlooked in climate change studies. It’s very difficult to get consistent data from the Pentagon and across US government departments. In fact, the United States insisted on an exemption for reporting military emissions in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. This loophole was closed by the Paris Accord, but with the Trump administration due to withdraw from the accord in 2020, this gap will will return.
Our study is based on data retrieved from multiple Freedom of Information Act requests to the US Defense Logistics Agency, the massive bureaucratic agency tasked with managing the US military’s supply chains, including its hydrocarbon fuel purchases and distribution.
The US military has long understood that it isn’t immune from the potential consequences of climate change – recognising it as a “threat multiplier” that can exacerbate other risks. Many, though not all, military bases have been preparing for climate change impacts like sea level rise. Nor has the military ignored its own contribution to the problem. As we have previously shown, the military has invested in developing alternative energy sources like biofuels, but these comprise only a tiny fraction of spending on fuels.
The American military’s climate policy remains contradictory. There have been attempts to “green” aspects of its operations by increasing renewable electricity generation on bases, but it remains the single largest institutional consumer of hydrocarbons in the world. It has also locked itself into hydrocarbon-based weapons systems for years to come, by depending on existing aircraft and warships for open-ended operations.
Environmentalists should argue for going beyond simply ‘greening’ military infrastructure.
Not green, but less, military
…the US military’s carbon bootprint must be addressed in domestic policy and international climate treaties.
Our study shows that action on climate change demands shuttering vast sections of the military machine. There are few activities on Earth as environmentally catastrophic as waging war. Significant reductions to the Pentagon’s budget and shrinking its capacity to wage war would cause a huge drop in demand from the biggest consumer of liquid fuels in the world.
It does no good tinkering around the edges of the war machine’s environmental impact. The money spent procuring and distributing fuel across the US empire could instead be spent as a peace dividend, helping to fund a Green New Deal in whatever form it might take. There are no shortage of policy priorities that could use a funding bump. Any of these options would be better than fuelling one of the largest military forces in history.“
https://theconversation.com/us-military-is-a-bigger-polluter-than-as-many-as-140-countries-shrinking-this-war-machine-is-a-must-119269 -
How the Pentagon’s Forever Wars Are Killing the Planet
Conspiracy Revelation: 22.6.2019: And all that to keep their fake NWO-Oil-Cartel-Retardation-Truman-Show-Loop alive…INSANE…STOP THEM!!! FOREVER!!! To save the World!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Release all classified free energy technology to the public.
Conspiracy Revelation: 22.6.2019: If people will be unable…Sophia and Theo will wipe them away and move them into a quarantine prison planet millions of light years away..

„How the Pentagon’s Forever Wars Are Killing the Planet“
„It’s been a harrowing couple of weeks for climate change observers. First, as Vice reported, there was an analysis from an Australian think tank, co-written by Ian Dunlop, a former fossil fuel company CEO, that posits that the planet is “reaching a ‘point of no return’ by mid-century, in which the prospect of a largely uninhabitable Earth leads to the breakdown of nations and the international order.’ ”
Then, on Wednesday, Brown University released a report revealing that the Department of Defense is “the world’s largest institutional user of petroleum and correspondingly, the single largest producer of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the world.” According to the report, the DOD released approximately 1.2 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, between 2001 and 2017.
Burning diesel and jet fuel for troop and weapons transport and usage causes 70% of the emissions, the report said.
In other words, the same institution that has kept America at war since 2001 is not only killing people, but also the planet. As CNBC pointed out, “The findings showed that if the Pentagon was listed as a country, its emissions would make it the world’s 55th largest contributor of greenhouse gases”—bigger than Portugal or Sweden.
CNBC called the report “the first of its kind to compile such comprehensive data.”
The Pentagon’s energy use was fairly stable from 1975 to 1990, and declined after the Cold War. Then came 9/11 and fighting in Afghanistan. After that, researcher Neta Crawford writes, “energy consumption by the DOD increased, and in 2005 hit its highest level in a decade. Since 2001 the DOD has consistently consumed between 77 and 80 percent of all US government energy consumption.”
“Unlike other elements of the current US administration,” she writes, the DOD acknowledges that climate change is an ongoing and dire issue. Crawford says that the department has made some improvements in terms of fossil fuel emissions, “[emphasizing] what it calls energy security — energy resilience and conservation” in its operations. Still, the agency remains a significant consumer of fossil fuel energy,” and ”there is room for much steeper cuts” to its carbon emissions and energy consumption.
Among Crawford’s suggestions for making those cuts are designing equipment with greater fuel economy, switching to alternative fuels, restructuring training, base closures, and reducing military operations worldwide.
If the DOD doesn’t cut its emissions and fuel consumption, Crawford warns that the consequences will be dire:
Absent any change in US military fuel use policy, the fuel consumption of the US military will necessarily continue to generate high levels of greenhouse gases. These greenhouse gases, combined with other US emissions, will help guarantee the nightmare scenarios that the military predicts and that many climate scientists say are possible.“
Source: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/how-the-pentagons-forever-wars-are-killing-the-planet/


