Kategorie: Mafia&State Crime

  • The Making of a Monster: We’re All Lab Rats in the Government’s Secret Experiments


    „The Making of a Monster: We’re All Lab Rats in the Government’s Secret Experiments“
    “But these weren’t the kind of monsters that had tentacles and rotting skin, the kind a seven-year-old might be able to wrap his mind around — they were monsters with human faces, in crisp uniforms, marching in lockstep, so banal you don’t recognize them for what they are until it’s too late.” — Ransom Riggs, Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children
    The U.S. government, in its pursuit of so-called monsters, has itself become a monster.
    This is not a new development, nor is it a revelation.
    This is a government that has in recent decades unleashed untold horrors upon the world — including its own citizenry — in the name of global conquest, the acquisition of greater wealth, scientific experimentation, and technological advances, all packaged in the guise of the greater good.
    Mind you, there is no greater good when the government is involved. There is only greater greed for money and power.
    Unfortunately, the public has become so easily distracted by the political spectacle coming out of Washington, DC, that they are altogether oblivious to the grisly experiments, barbaric behavior and inhumane conditions that have become synonymous with the U.S. government.
    These horrors are being meted out against humans and animals alike.
    It’s heartbreaking enough when you hear about police shooting family dogs that pose no threat — beloved pets that are “guilty” of little more than barking, or wagging a tag, or racing towards them in greeting — at an alarming rate somewhere in the vicinity of 500 dogs a day.
    What I’m about to share goes beyond heartbreaking to horrifying.“
    „It’s not just animals that are being treated like lab rats by government agencies.
    “We the people” have also become the police state’s guinea pigs: to be caged, branded, experimented upon without our knowledge or consent, and then conveniently discarded and left to suffer from the after-effects.
    Back in 2017, FEMA “inadvertently” exposed nearly 10,000 firefighters, paramedics and other responders to a deadly form of ricin during simulated bioterrorism response sessions. In 2015, it was discovered that an Army lab had been “mistakenly” shipping deadly anthrax to labs and defense contractors for a decade.“
    „While these particular incidents have been dismissed as “accidents,” you don’t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation’s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace — citizens and noncitizens alike — making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins.“
    „At the time, the government reasoned that it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society such as prisoners, mental patients, and poor blacks.
    Conspiracy Revelation: 30.6.2019: Nowadays this black is white….blacks are protected and whites become subjected to bioweapon research tests – in Germany – and utterly cruel and ai-driven brutal remote torture attacks / remote suffocation attacks / sleep deprivation attacks / neuroweaponized and terror satellite based process control attacks etc..etc.. (2005-2011-2012-2013-2015-2017-2018), especially German People…Due to the Hooton-Plan and the Zion-Nazi-Insanity to take over the planet…and their fear that Germany could become too powerful or owns the God-High-End-Intelligence-Genome is still in their deluded and paranoid evil infected minds…the worst factor is that all these traitors against Germany have eventually (at least) 50% German Roots..this is valid for most Ruling Crime Cabal Families…this is the worst case scenario of treason. A deceptive shifted hate projection out of pure fear, competitive thinking and cowardice. They know they stand no chance against Gods truly chosen ones.
    In Alabama, for example, 600 black men with syphilis were allowed to suffer without proper medical treatment in order to study the natural progression of untreated syphilis.
    In California, older prisoners had testicles from livestock and from recently executed convicts implanted in them to test their virility. In Connecticut, mental patients were injected with hepatitis.
    In Maryland, sleeping prisoners had a pandemic flu virus sprayed up their noses. In Georgia, two dozen “volunteering” prison inmates had gonorrhea bacteria pumped directly into their urinary tracts through the penis.
    In Michigan, male patients at an insane asylum were exposed to the flu after first being injected with an experimental flu vaccine. In Minnesota, 11 public service employee “volunteers” were injected with malaria, then starved for five days.
    In New York, dying patients had cancer cells introduced into their systems. In Ohio, over 100 inmates were injected with live cancer cells.
    Also in New York, prisoners at a reformatory prison were also split into two groups to determine how a deadly stomach virus was spread: the first group was made to swallow an unfiltered stool suspension, while the second group merely breathed in germs sprayed into the air.
    And in Staten Island, children with mental retardation were given hepatitis orally and by injection to see if they could then be cured.
    As the Associated Press reports, “The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries, accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations. By the 1960s, at least half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs … because they were cheaper than chimpanzees.”
    Moreover, “Some of these studies, mostly from the 1940s to the ’60s, apparently were never covered by news media. Others were reported at the time, but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures, while glossing over how test subjects were treated.”
    Media blackouts, propaganda, spin. Sound familiar?
    How many government incursions into our freedoms have been blacked out, buried under “entertainment” news headlines, or spun in such a way as to suggest that anyone voicing a word of caution is paranoid or conspiratorial?
    Unfortunately, these incidents are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the atrocities the government has inflicted on an unsuspecting populace in the name of secret experimentation.
    For instance, there was the U.S. military’s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men.
    As NPR reports:
    “All of the World War II experiments with mustard gas were done in secret and weren’t recorded on the subjects‘ official military records. Most do not have proof of what they went through. They received no follow-up health care or monitoring of any kind. And they were sworn to secrecy about the tests under threat of dishonorable discharge and military prison time, leaving some unable to receive adequate medical treatment for their injuries, because they couldn’t tell doctors what happened to them.”
    And then there was the CIA’s MKULTRA program in which hundreds of unsuspecting American civilians and military personnel were dosed with LSD, some having the hallucinogenic drug slipped into their drinks at the beach, in city bars, at restaurants.
    As Time reports, “before the documentation and other facts of the program were made public, those who talked of it were frequently dismissed as being psychotic.”
    Now one might argue that this is all ancient history and that the government today is different from the government of yesteryear, but has the U.S. government really changed?
    Has the government become any more humane, any more respectful of the rights of the citizenry?
    Has it become any more transparent or willing to abide by the rule of law? Has it become any more truthful about its activities? Has it become any more cognizant of its appointed role as a guardian of our rights?
    Or has the government simply hunkered down and hidden its nefarious acts and dastardly experiments under layers of secrecy, legalism and obfuscations? Has it not become wilier, more slippery, more difficult to pin down?
    Having mastered the Orwellian art of Doublespeak and followed the Huxleyan blueprint for distraction and diversion, are we not dealing with a government that is simply craftier and more conniving that it used to be?
    Consider this: after revelations about the government’s experiments spanning the 20th century spawned outrage, the government began looking for human guinea pigs in other countries, where “clinical trials could be done more cheaply and with fewer rules.”
    In Guatemala, prisoners and patients at a mental hospital were infected with syphilis, “apparently to test whether penicillin could prevent some sexually transmitted disease.” In Uganda, U.S.-funded doctors “failed to give the AIDS drug AZT to all the HIV-infected pregnant women in a study… even though it would have protected their newborns.”
    Meanwhile, in Nigeria, children with meningitis were used to test an antibiotic named Trovan. Eleven children died and many others were left disabled.
    The more things change, the more they stay the same.
    Case in point: back in 2016, it was announced that scientists working for the Department of Homeland Security would begin releasing various gases and particles on crowded subway platforms as part of an experiment aimed at testing bioterror airflow in New York subways.
    The government insisted that the gases released into the subways by the DHS were nontoxic and did not pose a health risk. It’s in our best interests, they said, to understand how quickly a chemical or biological terrorist attack might spread.
    And look how cool the technology is — said the government cheerleaders — that scientists can use something called DNATrax to track the movement of microscopic substances in air and food. (Imagine the kinds of surveillance that could be carried out by the government using trackable airborne microscopic substances you breathe in or ingest.)
    Mind you, this is the same government that in 1949 sprayed bacteria into the Pentagon’s air handling system, then the world’s largest office building. In 1950, special ops forces sprayed bacteria from Navy ships off the coast of Norfolk and San Francisco, in the latter case exposing all of the city’s 800,000 residents.
    Read: Did You Know U.S. Gov’t Conducted Bio-Warfare Experiments in San Francisco that Killed US Citizens?
    In 1953, government operatives staged “mock” anthrax attacks on St. Louis, Minneapolis, and Winnipeg using generators placed on top of cars. Local governments were reportedly told that “‘invisible smokescreen[s]’ were being deployed to mask the city on enemy radar.” Later experiments covered territory as wide-ranging as Ohio to Texas and Michigan to Kansas.
    In 1965, the government’s experiments in bioterror took aim at Washington’s National Airport, followed by a 1966 experiment in which army scientists exposed a million subway NYC passengers to airborne bacteria that causes food poisoning.
    And this is the same government that has taken every bit of technology sold to us as being in our best interests — GPS devices, surveillance, nonlethal weapons, etc. — and used it against us, to track, control and trap us.
    So, no, I don’t think the government’s ethics have changed much over the years. It’s just taken its nefarious programs undercover.
    The question remains: why is the government doing this? The answer is always the same: money, power and total domination.
    It’s the same answer no matter which totalitarian regime is in power.
    The mindset driving these programs has, appropriately, been likened to that of Nazi doctors experimenting on Jews. As the Holocaust Museum recounts, Nazi physicians “conducted painful and often deadly experiments on thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent.”
    The Nazi’s unethical experiments ran the gamut from freezing experiments using prisoners to find an effective treatment for hypothermia, tests to determine the maximum altitude for parachuting out of a plane, injecting prisoners with malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis, exposing prisoners to phosgene and mustard gas, and mass sterilization experiments.
    The horrors being meted out against the American people can be traced back, in a direct line, to the horrors meted out in Nazi laboratories. In fact, following the second World War, the U.S. government recruited many of Hitler’s employees, adopted his protocols, embraced his mindset about law and order and experimentation, and implemented his tactics in incremental steps.
    Sounds far-fetched, you say? Read on. It’s all documented.
    As historian Robert Gellately recounts, the Nazi police state was initially so admired for its efficiency and order by the world powers of the day that J. Edgar Hoover, then-head of the FBI, actually sent one of his right-hand men, Edmund Patrick Coffey, to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany’s secret police, the Gestapo.
    The FBI was so impressed with the Nazi regime that, according to the New York Times, in the decades after World War II, the FBI, along with other government agencies, aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis, including some of Hitler’s highest henchmen.
    All told, thousands of Nazi collaborators — including the head of a Nazi concentration camp, among others — were given secret visas and brought to America by way of Project Paperclip. Subsequently, they were hired on as spies, informants and scientific advisers, and then camouflaged to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler’s holocaust machine would remain unknown.
    All the while, thousands of Jewish refugees were refused entry visas to the U.S. on the grounds that it could threaten national security.
    Adding further insult to injury, American taxpayers have been paying to keep these ex-Nazis on the U.S. government’s payroll ever since. And in true Gestapo fashion, anyone who has dared to blow the whistle on the FBI’s illicit Nazi ties has found himself spied upon, intimidated, harassed and labeled a threat to national security.
    As if the government’s covert, taxpayer-funded employment of Nazis after World War II wasn’t bad enough, U.S. government agencies — the FBI, CIA and the military — have since fully embraced many of the Nazi’s well-honed policing tactics, and have used them repeatedly against American citizens.
    It’s certainly easy to denounce the full-frontal horrors carried out by the scientific and medical community within a despotic regime such as Nazi Germany, but what do you do when it’s your own government that claims to be a champion of human rights all the while allowing its agents to engage in the foulest, bases and most despicable acts of torture, abuse and experimentation?
    When all is said and done, this is not a government that has our best interests at heart.
    This is not a government that values us.
    Perhaps the answer lies in The Third Man, Carol Reed’s influential 1949 film starring Joseph Cotten and Orson Welles. In the film, set in a post-WW II Vienna, rogue war profiteer Harry Lime has come to view human carnage with a callous indifference, unconcerned that the diluted penicillin he’s been trafficking underground has resulted in the tortured deaths of young children.
    Challenged by his old friend Holly Martins to consider the consequences of his actions, Lime responds, “In these days, old man, nobody thinks in terms of human beings. Governments don’t, so why should we?”
    “Have you ever seen any of your victims?” asks Martins.
    “Victims?” responds Limes, as he looks down from the top of a Ferris wheel onto a populace reduced to mere dots on the ground. “Look down there. Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever?
    “If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money, or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax — the only way you can save money nowadays.”
    As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this is how the U.S. government sees us, too, when it looks down upon us from its lofty perch.
    To the powers-that-be, the rest of us are insignificant specks, faceless dots on the ground.
    To the architects of the American police state, we are not worthy or vested with inherent rights. This is how the government can justify treating us like economic units to be bought and sold and traded, or caged rats to be experimented upon and discarded when we’ve outgrown our usefulness.
    To those who call the shots in the halls of government, “we the people” are merely the means to an end.
    “We the people” — who think, who reason, who take a stand, who resist, who demand to be treated with dignity and care, who believe in freedom and justice for all — have become obsolete, undervalued citizens of a totalitarian state that, in the words of Rod Serling, “has patterned itself after every dictator who has ever planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history since the beginning of time. It has refinements, technological advances, and a more sophisticated approach to the destruction of human freedom.”
    In this sense, we are all Romney Wordsworth, the condemned man in Serling’s Twilight Zone episode “The Obsolete Man.”
    “The Obsolete Man” speaks to the dangers of a government that views people as expendable once they have outgrown their usefulness to the State. Yet — and here’s the kicker — this is where the government through its monstrous inhumanity also becomes obsolete.
    As Serling noted in his original script for “The Obsolete Man,” “Any state, any entity, any ideology which fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man…that state is obsolete.”
    How do you defeat a monster? You start by recognizing the monster for what it is.“
    „By John W. Whitehead — Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute“
    Source: http://humansarefree.com/2019/06/the-making-of-monster-were-all-lab-rats.html

  • Monsters Walk the Earth. Why These Three Countries Are the Real Troika of Evil

    Conspiracy Revelation: 30.6.2019: Ideally pointed out and perfectly clarified …fits exactly below the last 2 sharings in Conspiracy Revelation.
    „Monsters Walk the Earth. Why These Three Countries Are the Real Troika of Evil“
    „There are monsters among us. Every day I read about an American “plan” to either invade some place new or to otherwise inflict pain to convince a “non-compliant” foreign government how to behave. Last week it was Iran but next week it could just as easily again be Lebanon, Syria or Venezuela. Or even Russia or China, both of whom are seen as “threats” even though American soldiers, sailors and marines sit on their borders and not vice versa. The United States is perhaps unique in the history of the world in that it sees threats everywhere even though it is not, in fact, threatened by anyone.
    Just as often, one learns about a new atrocity by Israelis inflicted on the defenseless Arabs just because they have the power to do so. Last Friday in Gaza the Israeli army shot and killed four unarmed demonstrators and injured 300 more while the Jewish state’s police invaded a Palestinian orphanage school in occupied Jerusalem and shut it down because the students were celebrating a “Yes to peace, no to war” poetry festival. Peace is not in the Israeli authorized curriculum.
    And then there are the Saudis, publicly chopping the heads off of 37 “dissidents” in a mass display of barbarity, and also murdering and dismembering a hapless journalist. And let’s not forget the bombing and deliberate starving of hundreds of thousands innocent civilians in Yemen.
    It is truly a troika of evil, an expression favored by US National Security Advisor John Bolton, though he was applying it to Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, all “socialist” nations currently on Washington’s “hit list.” Americans, Saudis and Israelis have become monsters in the eyes of the rest of the world even if in their own minds they are endowed with special privilege due to their being “Exceptional,” “Chosen by God” or “Guardians of Mecca and Medina.” All three countries share a dishonest sense of entitlement that supports the fiction that their oppressive and often illegal behavior is somehow perfectly legitimate.
    To be sure not all Americans, Saudis or Israelis are individually monsters. Many are decent people who are appalled by what their respective governments are doing. Saudi citizens live under a despotism and have little to say about their government, but there is a formidable though fragmented peace movement in slightly less totalitarian Israel and in the United States there is growing anti-war sentiment. The discomfort in America is driven by a sense that the post 9/11 conflicts have only embroiled the country more deeply in wars that have no exit and no end. Unfortunately, the peace movement in Israel will never have any real power while the anti-war activists in America are leaderless and disorganized, waiting for someone to step up and take charge.
    An Iranian April Surprise?
    The current foreign policy debate centers around what Washington’s next moves in the Middle East might be. The decision-making will inevitably involve the US and its “close allies” Israel and Saudi Arabia, which should not surprise anyone. While it is clear that President Donald Trump ordered an attack on Iran before canceling the action at the last minute, exactly how that played out continues to be unclear. One theory, promoted by the president himself, is that the attack would have been disproportionate, killing possibly hundreds of Iranian military personnel in exchange for one admittedly very expensive surveillance drone. Killing the Iranians would have guaranteed an immediate escalation by Iran, which has both the will and the capability to hit high value targets in and around the Persian Gulf region, a factor that may also have figured into the presidential calculus.
    Trump’s cancelation of the attack immediately produced cries of rage from the usual neoconservative chickenhawk crowd in Washington as well as a more subdued reiteration of the Israeli and Saudi demands that Iran be punished, though both are also concerned that a massive Iranian retaliation would hit them hard. They are both hoping that Washington’s immensely powerful strategic armaments will succeed in knocking Iran out quickly and decisively, but they have also both learned not to completely trust the White House.
    To assuage the beast, the president has initiated a package of “major” new sanctions on Iran which will no doubt hurt the Iranian people while not changing government decision making one iota. There has also been a leak of a story relating to US cyber-attacks on Iranian military and infrastructure targets, yet another attempt to act aggressive to mitigate the sounds being emitted by the neocon chorus.
    To understand the stop-and-go behavior by Trump requires application of the Occam’s Razor principle, i.e. that the simplest explanation is most likely correct. For some odd reason, Donald Trump wants to be reelected president in 2020 in spite of the fact that he appears to be uncomfortable in office. A quick, successful war would enhance his chances for a second term, which is probably what Pompeo promised, but any military action that is not immediately decisive would hurt his prospects, quite possibly inflicting fatal damage. Trump apparently had an intercession by Fox news analyst Tucker Carlson, who may have explained that reality to him shortly before he decided to cancel the attack. Tucker is, for what it’s worth, a highly respected critic coming from the political right who is skeptical of wars of choice, democracy building and the global liberal order.
    The truth is that all of American foreign policy during the upcoming year will be designed to pander to certain constituencies that will be crucial to the 2020 presidential election. One can bank on even more concessions being granted to Israel and its murderous thug prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to bring in Jewish votes and, more importantly, money. John Bolton was already in Israel getting his marching orders from Netanyahu on the weekend and Pence was effusive in his praise of Israel when he spoke at the meeting in Orlando earlier in the week launching the Trump 2020 campaign, so the game is already afoot. It is an interesting process to observe how Jewish oligarchs like Sheldon Adelson contribute tens of millions of dollars to the politicians who then in turn give the Jewish state taxpayer generated tens of billions of dollars in return. Bribing corrupt politicians is one of the best investments that one can make in today’s America.
    Trump will also go easy on Saudi Arabia because he wants to sell them billions of dollars’ worth of weapons which will make the key constituency of the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) happy. And he will continue to exert “maximum pressure” on Iran and Venezuela to show how tough he can be for his Make America Great audience, though avoiding war if he possibly can just in case any of the hapless victims tries to fight back and embarrass him.
    So, there it is folks. War with Iran is for the moment on hold, but tune in again next week as the collective White House memory span runs to only three or four days. By next week we Americans might be at war with Mongolia.“
    Source: https://www.globalresearch.ca/monsters-walk-earth-why-these-three-countries-real-troika-evil/5681965?

  • JIMMY CARTER: THE U.S. IS AN “OLIGARCHY WITH UNLIMITED POLITICAL BRIBERY”

    „JIMMY CARTER: THE U.S. IS AN “OLIGARCHY WITH UNLIMITED POLITICAL BRIBERY”“
    „Former president Jimmy Carter said Tuesday on the nationally syndicated radio show the Thom Hartmann Program that the United States is now an “oligarchy” in which “unlimited political bribery” has created “a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors.” Both Democrats and Republicans, Carter said, “look upon this unlimited money as a great benefit to themselves.”
    ..
    HARTMANN: Our Supreme Court has now said, “unlimited money in politics.” It seems like a violation of principles of democracy. … Your thoughts on that?
    CARTER: It violates the essence of what made America a great country in its political system. Now it’s just an oligarchy, with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors and U.S. senators and congress members. So now we’ve just seen a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors, who want and expect and sometimes get favors for themselves after the election’s over. … The incumbents, Democrats and Republicans, look upon this unlimited money as a great benefit to themselves. Somebody’s who’s already in Congress has a lot more to sell to an avid contributor than somebody who’s just a challenger.
    I’ve added Carter’s statement to this list of politicians acknowledging that money controls politics. Please let me know if you have other good examples.“
    Source: https://theintercept.com/2015/07/30/jimmy-carter-u-s-oligarchy-unlimited-political-bribery/

  • Iran Says 'Tall, White' Space Aliens Control America

    Conspiracy Revelation: 30.6.2019: Article from 2014.
    Consider – before reading – that the writer is heavily biased and patriotic-brainwashed and indoctrinated (otherwise he wouldn´t need to stay political correct and frequently use the cia-groomed term „conspiracy theory“) concerning the aggressive Imperial – highly genocidal – U.S. Shadow Gov Inc. NWO-Empire, which is known to be the World Aggressor and Invader Number 1.
    „Iran Says ‚Tall, White‘ Space Aliens Control America“
    „Documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden conclusively prove that the United States has been ruled by a race of tall, white space aliens who also assisted the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
    These revelations about our alien overlords might not cost you any sleep. But the part that should concern you a tad is that the UFO story was just published by the Fars News Agency, the English-language news service of Iran… …naturally the Russians are behind it. The alleged alien invasion was revealed in an alleged report by Russia’s FSB spy agency, which found „incontrovertible proof‘ that an ‚alien/extraterrestrial intelligence agenda‘ is driving U.S. domestic and international policy, and has been doing so since at least 1945,“ said the Iranian news service.
    Alien not allowed (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
    Fars apparently got the story from a hard-core conspiracy site called whatdoesitmean.com. Here is the gist of the whatdoesitmean.com story as best I understand it (or as the alien mind-control lasers allow me to understand it):
    Snowden, who has been given asylum in Russia, leaked documents that a race of extraterestrial „tall whites“ arrived on Earth, helped Nazi Germany build a fleet of advanced submarines in the 1930s, and then met in 1954 with President Dwight Eisenhower „where the ’secret regime‘ currently ruling over America was established.“
    „Most disturbingly, this FSB report warns, is that the ‚Tall White‘ agenda being implemented by the ’secret regime‘ ruling the United States calls for the creation of a global electronic surveillance system meant to hide all true information about their presence here on earth as they enter into what one of Snowden’s documents calls the ‚final phase‘ of their end plan for total assimilation and world rule.“
    Meanwhile, the U.S. government is embroiled in a „cataclysmic“ power struggle between President Obama, who heads the alien shadow government, and some unknown force that opposed the U.S.-alien alliance. „Most to be feared by Russian policy makers and authorities, this [FSB] report concludes, is if those opposing the ‚Tall White‘ ’secret regime‘ ruled over by Obama have themselves aligned with another alien-extraterrestrial power themselves.“
    Any good conspiracy theory needs a patina of truth, a bit of intellectual cover to camouflage the craziness. In this case, the whatdoesitmean.com/Fars story cites Paul Hellyer, the 1960s Canadian defense minister who is now a fervent UFO activist.
    This is almost a funny story, until one remembers that Iran is a moderately powerful nation of 76 million people, with a possible nuclear arsenal, relatively large conventional military power, extensive terrorist capabilities through its intelligence agencies and Hezbollah, and a fundamentalist government that could easily engage in hostilities against the U.S. … The Fars News Agency is reportedly affiliated with Iran’s influential Revolutionary Guards, which suggests that either Iran is either desperate to smear the U.S. any way it can, or there indeed is a very peculiar view of U.S. politics at the highest levels of the Iranian government.
    If there is a bright spot to this as well as a funny bone, it’s that the goal of U.S. policy is to contain and neutralize Iranian influence. So, perhaps it’s not necessarily a bad thing that Teheran thinks its main adversary is backed by the power of space aliens. It’s good to have friends in high places…“
    Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelpeck/2014/01/13/iran-says-tall-white-space-aliens-control-america/#4c8b1a08f2cd

  • 5000 Menschen protestieren gegen Airbase Ramstein


    „5000 Menschen protestieren gegen Airbase Ramstein“
    „Kommon
    Am 29.06.2019 veröffentlicht
    Doppelt soviele wie im Vorjahr demonstrieren vor der Airbase Ramstein.
    Hunderte campierten seit 2 Wochen nahe der Airbase. Vom Camp gingen vielfältige Aktionen aus: Diskussions- und Informationsveranstaltungen, Versuche von Straßenblockaden, internationale Vernetzung mit Anti-Basen Aktivist*innen aus aller Welt. Die Kampagne „Stopp Ramstein“ freut sich auf neue Dynamik der Friedensbewegung und startet jetzt schon die Vorbereitungen für die Aktionswochen für 2020.“

  • Der lachende Tod der Menschenfresser

    Conspiracy Revelation: 29.6.2019: Vielleicht schreckt das mal die widerwärtigen Kannibalpsychopathen ab..
    /
    Maybe this will scare the obnoxious cannibal psychopaths off..
    „20.11.2000
    Der lachende Tod der Menschenfresser
    Der Hirnschwamm vCJK kann noch 40 Jahre nach dem Fleischkonsum ausbrechen.
    Eine seltsame Seuche brach unter den Kannibalen Neuguineas aus. Die Menschenfresser kicherten idiotisch, torkelten und zitterten am ganzen Leib. Der Geist verfiel in raschem Tempo. Die Erkrankten starben innerhalb weniger Monate.
    Mehr als 2500 Frauen und Männer des Fore-Stammes, eines Steinzeitvolkes im Regenwald der pazifischen Insel, wurden im vorigen Jahrhundert dahingerafft. Seinen Namen verdankt das unheilvolle Leiden jenen unkontrollierbaren Lachattacken, mit denen es sich ankündigt. „Kuru“ bedeutet in der Fore-Sprache „der lachende Tod“. Erst als die australischen Territorialherren 1957 die Menschenfresserei unterbanden, verebbte die Epidemie.
    Kuru, die Krankheit der Kannibalen, schien beinahe schon in den Annalen der Heilkunst vergessen. Doch jetzt liefert sie möglicherweise entscheidende Erkenntnisse über „Menschen-BSE“: jene neue Variante der Creutzfeldt-Jakob-Krankheit (vCJK), die immer mehr Männer, Frauen und Kinder in Europa befällt. Die Leiden sind eng verwandt: Genau wie bei vCJK weichen bei Kuru Regionen des menschlichen Gehirns schwammartig auf und zerstören auf diese Weise das Denkorgan.
    Überdies werden beide Erkrankungen durch Gehirn und Gewebe aus dem Rückenmark übertragen. Die Fore aßen aus rituellen Gründen die Gehirne ihrer infizierten Toten und steckten sich dadurch an, wie der spätere Nobelpreisträger Carleton Gajdusek in den fünfziger Jahren als Erster entdeckte. Die Europäer verzehrten BSEkranke Kühe. Eng verwandt ist auch die Natur des Erregers: vCJK wie Kuru werden durch infektiöse Eiweißmoleküle, so genannte Prionen, ausgelöst.
    Umso beängstigender klingt deshalb, was John Collinge, BSE-Experte am St. Mary’s Hospital in London und Regierungsberater, in der vorvergangenen Woche auf einem Kongress in der englischen Hauptstadt verkündete: Kuru sei weitaus ansteckender, als die Wissenschaft bisher befürchtet hatte.
    Das hat Collinge jetzt durch die Untersuchung von elf älteren Kuru-Opfern aus Neuguinea festgestellt: Obwohl die Erkrankten seit 40 Jahren kein Menschenfleisch mehr angerührt hatten, war der todbringende Hirnschwamm doch noch ausgebrochen.
    Nicht nur die extrem lange Inkubation erregt Besorgnis. Alle Opfer hatten zudem eine ganz bestimmte genetische Ausstattung, die man bisher eigentlich für einen besonders wirksamen Schutz gegen Kuru hielt. Nun zeigt sich: Kein Mensch ist dank seiner guten Erbanlagen gegen Kuru immun – und das gilt wohl auch für die eng verwandte vCJK.
    Dabei hatten Wissenschaftler bisher immer wieder beschwichtigt: Die Mehrheit der Menschen sei auf Grund bestimmter Gene von Natur aus resistent gegen das neuartige Hirnleiden. Die Theorie basiert auf Gentests an den bisher 88 vCJK-Toten und Kranken in Großbritannien. Sämtliche Opfer trugen eine ganz bestimmte Gen-Variante auf dem Chromosom 20: Sie begünstigt die Zusammenballung der giftigen Prionen im Gehirn, falls man mit dem Erreger in Kontakt kommt.
    In Großbritannien tragen 37 Prozent der Menschen dieses Verhängnis in ihren Genen – die übrigen 63 Prozent der Bevölkerung hingegen schienen gefeit gegen die neue Form der Creutzfeldt-Jakob-Krankheit.
    Die Ergebnisse des Kuru-Forschers Collinge lassen das jetzt mehr als vage erscheinen – vermutlich ist jeder Mensch anfällig. Unter der Mehrheit der noch gesunden Menschen mit den scheinbar schützenden Genen bricht der Hirnschwamm möglicherweise nur später aus als unter der anfälligeren Minderheit. „vCJK könnte jeden bedrohen, der dem infektiösen Agens ausgesetzt war“, warnt das englische Wissenschaftsblatt „New Scientist“.
    Unversehens erscheinen die 88 vCJK-Opfer wie Vorboten einer Epidemie, die erst noch kommen wird. Millionen von Briten, aber auch Kontinentaleuropäer haben nach Bekanntwerden der BSE-Seuche Beef und Burger verschlungen, als sei nichts geschehen. Jene, die sich dabei infizierten, werden womöglich erst in vier Jahrzehnten krank werden.
    John Collinge jedenfalls geht von einem lang anhaltenden Seuchenzug aus: Fälle von vCJK, prophezeit der Mediziner, werde man „sicherlich noch bis in die zweite Hälfte des Jahrhunderts sehen“.
    Von Jörg Blech“
    Quelle: https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-17871172.html

  • Big Brother is keeping 'Five Eyes' on you

    Conspiracy Revelation: 29.6.2019: Very well written, countered and clarified.
    „Big Brother is keeping ‚Five Eyes‘ on you“
    „Just last week, the world’s leading snooping powers quietly and without notice issued a disturbing warning to tech giants, telling them to surrender unprecedented backdoor access to their citizens‘ data.
    Not many people know this, but the United Kingdom has some of the most extreme spying powers in the developed world. At the end of 2016, passing what some people called the „Snooper’s Charter,“ the UK put into law some of the most draconian anti-privacy laws that we have ever known, allowing its government to compel companies to break their own encryption.
    The UK plays a pivotal part in the so-called Five Eyes alliance, which also includes the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Nobody knew it at the time, but the American military base which my family and I grew up next to has played a crucial role in delivering US drone strikes across the Middle East and beyond. America’s drone-strike regime, largely considered illegal for numerous reasons, is not something that countries should willingly participate in lightly and without public scrutiny.
    Why am I mentioning this? Because it goes to the very heart of my point: the extent to which we know or do not know what our governments are doing behind closed doors is quite literally a matter of life and death.
    Now, it has been revealed that the Five Eyes alliance, dedicated to a global „collect-it-all“ surveillance task, has issued a memo calling on their governments to demand that tech companies build backdoor access for states to access users‘ encrypted data or face measures that will force companies to comply.
    ‘Five Eyes’ govt spy ring seeks laws to make big tech companies share encrypted messages.
    The memo was released quietly with little media coverage last week by the Australian Department of Home Affairs, and essentially demanded that providers „create customized solutions, tailored to their individual system architectures that are capable of meeting lawful access requirements.“ The memo was reportedly released after ministers for the intelligence agencies of the Five Eyes nations met on Australia’s Gold Coast last week.
    The most laughable aspect, of course, was the opening sentence, which ironically reads: the „governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are committed to personal rights and privacy, and support the role of encryption in protecting those rights.“
    Yes, of course. Also worthy of note is the order in which those countries appear in the memo, clearly ranking from biggest bully in the playground to the push-over child at school who is just happy and content to be a part of the „club.“
    If we are to take the memo at its face value, end-to-end encryption is potentially our best friend. The memo itself admits that some encrypted data is nearly impossible for intelligence agencies to crack on their own, as they are struggling to make sense of the data they are currently intercepting. This is why they are forcibly calling on the world’s leading tech providers to do their work for them.
    Will those tech companies cave in to these government’s demands? You can bet your bottom dollar that eventually, yes, they very well might. While Facebook did not comment directly on the memo, instead attempting to refer questions to a public blog that the social media giant published in May explaining its policies on encryption, there is one important ingredient missing from the future of these policies.
    After Donald Trump was elected in 2016, the US establishment and its media cohorts went into a „fake news“ frenzy that saw Barack Obama deliver a stern attack on Facebook directly, supposedly being one of the main disseminators of fake news. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s CEO and founder, completely dismissed the idea that Facebook played a substantial role in this… Despite this statement, hoping no one had noticed, barely a few days later, Facebook then announced it was adopting a string of measures to fight „fake news“ after all.
    You could soon spend 10 years in Australian jail if you don’t hand over your phone password to cops
    Why the sudden change in heart? Could it be that, according to the Washington Post, in that trivial space of time, Barack Obama personally pulled aside Zuckerberg in a private room, on the sidelines of a meeting of world leaders in Peru, so that the president could make a personal appeal to Zuckerberg to take the threat of „fake news“ more seriously?
    In other words, these big companies will always inevitably cave to government pressure whether or not they even agree with what these governments are saying. According to the New York Times, one Facebook official said that the Australian memo had „no teeth,“ but was in fact „part of an escalating war between governments and Silicon Valley tech giants over access to people’s private data.“
    In that context, the warnings speak for themselves. The companies who do not comply with these nations‘ demands will be hit with „technological, enforcement, legislative, or other measures to achieve lawful access solutions,“ according to the memo, which does not detail what sort of measures these will be. Also unclear is how much access and to what, exactly, the governments of the Five Eyes are proposing. However, it seems likely that the least it would allow each government is access to encrypted call and message data relating to their citizens.
    Given that Facebook has been breaching our privacy in favor of government agencies for a long time now, you can rest assured that Zuckerberg will not put up any meaningful resistance to this new decree issued by the Five Eyes network.
    This idea of „fake news“ and still-unsubstantiated claims of extensive foreign interference in Western democracies more or less set the tone for the Five Eyes gathering in Australia. Perhaps, just perhaps, the aim of these governments was not to discuss what to do about child-trafficking or international crime as they claim, but actually something more broadly related to containing these powers‘ number-one adversary (here are two clues).

    It is worth noting that there has been next to no criticism of these Five Eyes powers for delivering such a blatant attack on our right to privacy. Remember that, of course, Russian President Vladimir Putin is attempting to „wrest control of the internet,“ as the Guardian wrote approximately three years ago. But these same Western media companies are awkwardly silent about what their own governments are proposing to do, something which other nations could only dream about achieving on such a global scale.
    It needs to be said that now is the time to start paying attention. If you think the same governments that facilitate terrorism all over the planet want to access your data to in good faith to do nothing other than foil terrorist plots, you are nothing short of naïve.
    Privacy matters, whether you think you matter or not; and if you don’t believe me, who better to demonstrate this point than Mark Zuckerberg himself?
    „This same division can be seen with the CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, who in an infamous interview in 2010 pronounced that privacy is no longer a ’social norm,’“ journalist Glenn Greenwald noted in his TEDtalk, „Why Privacy Matters.“
    „Last year, Mark Zuckerberg and his new wife purchased not only their own house but also all four adjacent houses in Palo Alto for a total of $30 million in order to ensure that they enjoyed a zone of privacy that prevented other people from monitoring what they do in their personal lives,“ Greenwald continued.
    So, why does all of this matter anyway? If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, am I right?
    Firstly, security researchers and other critics of these backdoor access proposals have stated time and time again that there is no workable way to create a „secure backdoor“ that would not be vulnerable to intercept by hackers who have not been sanctioned access to the data.
    Secondly, this line of nonsensical thinking was graciously debunked and tossed into the fire, never to be seen again, by none other than infamous whistleblower Edward Snowden, who stated:
    „…privacy isn’t about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect. That’s who you are. Privacy is baked into our language, our core concepts of government and self in every way. It’s why we call it ‚private property.‘ Without privacy you don’t have anything for yourself.“
    „Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.“
    For those of us who have plenty to say, the memo is nothing but an attack on all our fundamental rights and freedoms, and should be rejected in the same manner in which the media has chosen to ignore it.
    Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!“
    Source: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/437895-privacy-five-eyes-encryption/

  • Orwell’s 1984 no longer reads like fiction. It’s the reality of our times

    „Orwell’s 1984 no longer reads like fiction. It’s the reality of our times“
    (Getty Images / gremlin)
    „70 years ago, the British writer George Orwell captured the essence of technology in its ability to shape our destinies in his seminal work, 1984. The tragedy of our times is that we have failed to heed his warning. No matter how many times I read 1984, the feeling of total helplessness and despair that weaves itself throughout Orwell’s masterpiece never fails to take me by surprise. Although usually referred to as a ‘dystopian futuristic novel’, it is actually a horror story on a scale far greater than anything that has emerged from the minds of prolific writers like Stephen King or Dean Koontz. The reason is simple. The nightmare world that the protagonist Winston Smith inhabits, a place called Oceania, is all too easily imaginable. Man, as opposed to some imaginary clown or demon, is the evil monster. In the very first pages of the book, Orwell demonstrates an uncanny ability to foresee future trends in technology. Describing the protagonist Winston Smith’s frugal London flat, he mentions an instrument called a ‘telescreen’, which sounds strikingly similar to the handheld ‘smartphone’ that is enthusiastically used by billions of people around the world today.
    „Orwell describes the ubiquitous device as an “oblong metal plaque like a dulled mirror” affixed to the wall that “could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely.” Sound familiar? It is through this gadget that the rulers of Oceania are able to monitor the actions of its citizens every minute of every day. At the same time, the denizens of 1984 were never allowed to forget they were living in a totalitarian surveillance state, under the control of the much-feared Thought Police. Massive posters with the slogan ‘Big Brother is Watching You’ were as prevalent as our modern-day advertising billboards. Today, however, such polite warnings about surveillance would seem redundant, as reports of unauthorized spying still gets the occasional lazy nod in the media now and then.“
    „In fact, just in time for 1984’s anniversary, it has been reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) has once again been illicitly collecting records on telephone calls and text messages placed by US citizens. This latest invasion of privacy has been casually dismissed as an “error” after an unnamed telecommunications firm handed over call records the NSA allegedly “hadn’t requested” and “weren’t approved” by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. In 2013, former CIA employee Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the NSA’s intrusive surveillance operations, yet somehow the government agency is able to continue – with the help of the corporate sector – vacuuming up the private information of regular citizens.“
    „Another method of control alluded to in 1984 fell under a system of speech known as ‘Newspeak’, which attempted to reduce the language to ‘doublethink’, with the ulterior motive of controlling ideas and thoughts. For example, the term ‘joycamp’, a truncated term every bit as euphemistic as the ‘PATRIOT Act’, was used to describe a forced labor camp, whereas a ‘doubleplusgood duckspeaker’ was used to praise an orator who ‘quacked’ correctly with regards to the political situation.
    Another Newspeak term, known as ‘facecrime’, provides yet another striking parallel to our modern situation. Defined as “to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offense.” It would be difficult for the modern reader to hear the term ‘facecrime’ and not connect it with ‘Facebook’, the social media platform that regularly censors content creators for expressing thoughts it finds ‘hateful’ or inappropriate. What social media users need is an Orwellian lesson in ‘crimestop’, which Orwell defined as “the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought.” Those so-called unacceptable ‘dangerous thoughts’ were determined not by the will of the people, of course, but by their rulers.
    And yes, it gets worse. Just this week, Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘private company’ agreed to give French authorities the “identification data” of Facebook users suspected of spreading ‘hate speech’ on the platform, in what would be an unprecedented move on the part of Silicon Valley.
    ‘Hate speech’ is precisely one of those delightfully vague, subjective terms with no real meaning that one would expect to find in the Newspeak style guide. Short of threatening the life of a person or persons, individuals should be free to criticize others without fear of reprisal, least of all from the state, which should be in the business of protecting free speech at all cost.“
    „Another modern phenomenon that would be right at home in Orwell’s Oceania is the obsession with political correctness, which is defined as “the avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.” But since so many people today identify with some marginalized group, this has made the intelligent discussion of controversial ideas – not least of all on US college campuses, of all places – exceedingly difficult, if not downright dangerous. Orwell must be looking down on all of this madness with much surprise, since he provided the world with the best possible warning to prevent it.
    For anyone who entertains expectations for a happy ending in 1984, be prepared for serious disappointment (spoiler alert, for the few who have somehow not read this book). Although Winston Smith manages to finally experience love, the brief romance – like a delicate flower that was able to take root amid a field of asphalt – is crushed by the authorities with shocking brutality. Not satisfied with merely destroying the relationship, however, Smith is forced to betray his ‘Julia’ after undergoing the worst imaginable torture at the ‘Ministry of Love’.
    The book ends with the words, “He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.” Will we too declare, like Winston Smith, our love for ‘Big Brother’ above all else, or will we emerge victorious against the forces of a technological tyranny that appears to be just over the horizon? Or is Orwell’s 1984 just really good fiction and not the instruction manual for tyrants many have come to fear it is?
    An awful lot is riding on our answers to those questions, and time is running out.
    @Robert_Bridge“
    Source: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462924-george-orwell-1984-70/

  • Genocide Treaty – Deborah Tavares

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKEGUKvo4vk
    „GENOCIDE TREATY WAS SIGNED BY USA INC. IN 1988. RUSSIA SIGNED GENOCIDE TREATY IN 1949.
    GENOCIDE TREATY IS THE MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN 96 GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD.
    WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED. KILLING OF ENTIRE POPULATIONS HAPPENING NOW!“
    „I want to talk to you further about the genocide treaty this is imperative and it’s built and based upon the fundamental understanding that we do not have a government we need to all
    understand that we are in a warfare called attrition the action or process of gradually reducing the strength and effectiveness of someone or something through sustained attacks or pressure
    that’s what we are all confronting now with the weaponized weather assaults all over the world and we are going to get
    into more of that after I continue with the genocide treaty.“
    „We have actors in place, in political levels that appear to look like a functioning government and of course it’s not, the treaty was quickly signed by the very nations that are practicing genocide on day to day basis, again a list of the signatures of the Genocide treaty reveals that it includes
    the leading practitioners of post-world War two genocide and those that have signed this are from Albania, Bulgaria,
    Red China, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Vietnam and the Soviet Union and more, no American citizen or resident alien legal or otherwise is excluded from the sweep of this article in this treaty as for the enumerated crimes killing of the group does not allow for any legal defense, this is why there is
    no admission to the Chemtrailing and all the poisons and toxins and viruses that are being spread on us this is why there
    is no recourse for the vaccination program I want to add at this point that it’s important to understand with the 5g
    network coming in that dormant viruses that we have been vaccinated with or at least those that have chosen to be
    vaccinated with will be activated by frequencies we’re going to see many illnesses globally from the vaccination programs but the Genocide treaty goes on to say that causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of a group.“

  • Bayer purchased Monsanto with European taxpayers’ money

    „Bayer purchased Monsanto with European taxpayers’ money“
    „As Bayer’s situation worsens, taxpayers could take a big hit
    According to an article in the German press by the journalist and author Gaby Weber, Germany’s central bank – the Bundesbank – helped finance Bayer’s takeover of Monsanto with European taxpayers’ money.
    Three years ago, Bayer CEO Werner Baumann launched his bid to buy Monsanto. He promised it would make Bayer a global player and provide huge dividends for shareholders. According to Weber, greed prevented a prudent risk analysis. As a result, says Weber, Bayer’s stock is now in the doldrums, there are astronomical claims for damages coming from the US, and Bayer is threatened with takeover or bankruptcy.
    Unfortunately, the buck stops not with Bayer’s shareholders or its managers, says Weber, but with the taxpayer. In the face of impending bankruptcy, the German government will probably step in – as it did in the banking crisis. The Bundesbank will also incur considerable losses in such a situation because it was the Bundesbank that financed a large part of the purchase of Monsanto, via a programme of the European Central Bank (ECB), which gets its money from European taxpayers.
    A spokesman for the ECB, William Lelieveldt, has confirmed to Weber that the Bayer bonds were purchased under the ECB’s asset purchasing programme. But Weber says Lelieveldt wouldn’t disclose the exact amount or the interest rate.
    Weber says Lelieveldt claimed that „risk management considerations“ were employed. But Lelieveldt did not spell out what exactly these were. The bonds are in the portfolio of the Bundesbank. Weber’s applications for the risk assessment are pending in Brussels and in Frankfurt. She says if she’s denied the information, she will seek legal remedies.
    Weber also has a lawsuit against Bayer AG to force the company to publish its due diligence report. Her case will be heard on 12 September before the Higher Regional Court of Cologne.
    Bayer, which promises „higher standards of transparency“, paid $62 billion for Monsanto. A quarter of that is said to have come from equity, from sales of company shares to BASF, which the US Securities and Exchange Commission had demanded, and from the sale of materials manufacturer Covestro. In addition, Bayer had issued new shares through a capital increase and engaged Bank of America, Crédit Suisse, and Haus Rothschild for the remainder.
    The Bundesbank’s head, Weidmann, has applied for the position of ECB president. But, according to Weber, having given European taxpayers‘ money to Monsanto’s shareholders, his chances of getting the top job are falling along with Bayer’s share price.“
    Source: https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/19005-bayer-purchased-monsanto-with-european-taxpayers-money