conspiracyrevelation.net

Kategorie: Protection

  • Cancer researchers don’t want a ‘cure’, they would lose billions

    One of the core evils in our times… medical pharma-oil mafia in collusion with governmental alphabet agencies and corporate crime syndicates…total pathocratic overkilll…it would take several acts of God to take down the genocidal bioweaponized chemtrail nwo militarized nazion doctor mafia…also the new skynet neuro-society with medical cointelpro sabotage and torture tactics against freedom fighters…

    „Cancer researchers don’t want a ‘cure’, they would lose billions
    08/23/2016 / By Vicki Batts
    The war on cancer began nearly half a century ago, and yet, not much has really changed. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent on cancer research and development, so you’d think by now they’d have come up with better, more effective treatments, wouldn’t you? Look at the immense developments that have been made in other forms of technology — and in less time! Smart phones, anyone?
    All of the money spent and research conducted has had very little impact on cancer incidence; modest reductions in cancer deaths are largely attributed to earlier detection, which in turn increases five-year survival rates. The five-year survival rate is modern medicine’s most favored measurement of success, though in terms of overall lifespan, five years is really a drop in the bucket for most people.
    Of course, there are reasons why cancer research has been begrudgingly slow to make progress. First and foremost, most research directs itself away from the true primary cause of cancer: exposure to toxins. Decades ago, this could have been attributed to a lack of knowledge, but today it is clear that there are reasons behind this diversion.
    Two primary reasons are to protect corporate interests and those who produce and sell toxins, as well as mainstream medicine’s greed. Cancer is a multi-billion dollar industry, so why would they sacrifice their virtually boundless income just to heal people?
    By continuing to keep the focus off of what causes cancer (toxins), the endless cancer “research” prevents toxin-producing industries and toxin-containing products from being scrutinized. The American Cancer Society itself states, “Only about 5% to 10% of all cancers result directly from gene defects (called mutations) inherited from a parent.” This would suggest that the amount of cancer research that is done on inherited cancers is relatively disproportionate. It should also suggest that the main cause of cancer probably isn’t genetic.
    The Truth About Cancer reports, “In 2010, the President’s Cancer Panel provided strong confirmation that exposure to toxic chemicals is an important and under-recognized risk factor for cancer. Right on cue, the industry-influenced American Cancer Society attempted to refute the panel’s conclusions.” Along with other organizations, like the National Cancer Institute, they continue to perpetuate the myth that the primary cause of cancer is actually genetics. In doing so, these phony, corporate-funded mouthpieces are essentially saying that toxins are less likely to harm us than the DNA making up our own bodies.
    The fact remains that corporate interests, even within the cancer industry itself, far outweigh the quest to find a cure. In addition to protecting those who donate the most money to their organizations, much of the medical industry revolves around cancer treatment and repeat customers. Oncologists, nurses, technicians, drug manufacturers, and many other players all rely on the constant flow of cancer to keep their income on the up and up.
    The real question we should be asking is not, “Why isn’t there a cure?” Instead, we should be asking ourselves, “Why are we surprised?”
    Source: GreenMediaInfo.com

  • Switzerland puts geoengineering governance on UN environment agenda

    „Switzerland puts geoengineering governance on UN environment agenda“
    „Published on 26/02/2019, 6:00am
    No longer the preserve of science fiction, climate-hacking technologies may need international oversight, say backers of draft resolution“
    „Some geoengineering proposals are modelled on erupting volcanoes, which can lead to cooling as ash is pumped into the atmosphere, deflecting the sun’s rays (Pic: Pixabay)
    By Sara Stefanini
    Switzerland wants the world to talk about if and how to use untested technology that tampers with nature to slow climate change – and will ask the UN’s environment arm to take the lead.
    Geoengineering techniques that reflect away sun rays and suck carbon from the atmosphere have long been talked about as last-resort solutions to stem the worst effects of climate change.
    But as greenhouse gas emissions remain stubbornly high and geoengineering research gets underway, there is growing concern these technologies could be deployed without protections against their serious risks – and that the prospect of a technofix will be taken as a licence to keep on polluting.
    To kickstart the conversation, Switzerland will introduce a resolution at the UN Environment Assembly in Kenya in mid-March, calling for an assessment of the potential methods and governance frameworks for each one by August 2020. It would be an early step towards an international system for regulating the suite of technologies.
    “There is a risk that geoengineering could be applied by someone without any international control, and we are very concerned about that,” Franz Perrez, head of the international affairs division at Switzerland’s Federal Office for the Environment, told Climate Home News. “Some are already testing solar radiation management, scientific research is already going on. We cannot close our eyes anymore and say ‘This is only science fiction’.”
    The resolution is backed by Burkina Faso, Micronesia, Georgia, Lichtenstein, Mali, Mexico, Montenegro, Niger, South Korea and Senegal, according to the latest version dated 25 February.
    Geoengineering refers to a wide range of techniques for modifying the climate system, from planting trees to fiddling with clouds.
    Untested technologies to manage solar radiation – essentially, dim the sun – pose the biggest concerns. Ideas include releasing aerosol particles from airplanes to reflect sunlight away (mimicking the effects of volcanic eruptions) and spraying seawater drops into clouds to make them more reflective. But they could also change weather patterns, disrupting agriculture and exacerbating geopolitical tensions.
    And if this is not accompanied by emissions reductions, more will be needed to sustain the temperature effect – “practically forever”, Douglas MacMartin, a leading geoengineering scientist working at Cornell University and Caltech, told a Chatham House conference in London last week.
    Yet with government oversight, it may be preferable to runaway global warming. “You would not take chemotherapy drugs just for fun, you would not sit in your car and set off your airbags just for fun,” MacMartin said. “There are clearly serious challenges to solar geoengineering, but they only make sense to face in context with the challenges of climate change itself.”
    Geoengineering: Poor country scientists to get support to study impacts
    Better-known options, which remove CO2 from the air, include afforestation and combining biomass power plants with technology to catch and store their emissions (known as BECCS). But even simple interventions like tree-planting may call for international rules to ensure that emissions cuts in one place aren’t cancelled out somewhere else.
    Attention to geoengineering is growing as the global temperature remains on course to rise by at least 3C compared to pre-industrial levels. The UN’s panel of climate scientists suggested last October it would be difficult to meet the Paris Agreement’s stretch limit of 1.5C without some of these more radical techniques.
    “The reality is that [carbon dioxide removal] is no longer a question of whether or not [according to the UN science report]. It’s which one, which technology, how much, when do you start, who pays for it,” said Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative and the former UN assistant secretary-general on climate change.
    “But there has been very little debate [about solar radiation management] in the circles beyond scientists… it’s still looked at as esoteric, science fiction, crazy, difficult, challenging – and all of those things apply,” he told CHN at the Chatham House conference.
    Global issues need global coverage
    CHN is dedicated to bringing you the best climate reporting from around the world. It’s a huge job and we need your help.
    Through our Patreon account you can give as little or as much as you like to support our work. It’s safe and easy to sign up.
    For some, however, geoengineering is so dangerous that it should be banned altogether.
    It could worsen the climate, be weaponised and exacerbate geopolitical imbalances, said Silvia Ribeiro, Latin America director at ETC Group, an organisation that looks at socioeconomic and ecological issues around new technologies. “Investments in geoengineering are already providing justifications for high greenhouse gas emitters to continue emitting and postpone real reductions.”
    The UN has so far taken a cautious, piecemeal approach. Th 190-plus parties to its Convention on Biological Diversity extended a moratorium on all climate-related technologies in 2016, while a 2013 convention on marine pollution prohibited geoengineering of the oceans. The UN’s climate change secretariat regulates global emissions accounting, including from forestry and bioenergy.
    ETC Group worries the Swiss resolution implicitly assumes that geoengineering is acceptable and just needs international governance.
    Perrez countered that the country wants the UN Environment Programme to assess the state of the science and the research gaps, the risks, benefits and uncertainties, the actors working on research and deployment, and how it could all be governed. Then, he said, countries can start talking about what to allow and how.
    But the way emissions are going now, “it’s hard to say that it will not be needed”, Pasztor said, referring to CO2 removal. “The reality is that emissions reductions alone are no longer enough, because we have already put so much carbon into the atmosphere that even if we stop today we’re still going to keep this climate change for hundreds of years.”“
    Source: https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/02/26/swiss-push-talk-geoengineering-goes-sci-fi-reality/

  • Skalarwellen, EMF und ELF Globalspionage 24/7/365


    „Skalarwellen, EMF und ELF Globalspionage 24/7/365“
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr5mgDcNSmI
    „Staatsschutz-Tricks: Die böse Nachbarin
    5.643 Aufrufe
    angeblicherterrorist
    Am 30.09.2018 veröffentlicht
    Der älteteste Staatsschutz-Trick ist bei vielen von Euch wahrscheinlich weitgehend unbekannt, deshalb an dieser Stelle endlich ein VIdeo zum Thema. Wenn Ihr selbst überwacht werdet, nehmt Euch die Tipps zu Herzen !“
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EpKLwXE4t8
    „Wie man jedes Überwachungsgerät findet!
    10.666 Aufrufe“
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkjQ-LLm9eY
    „Was Ihr über den Überwacherjob wissen müsst
    14.036 Aufrufe“
    „angeblicherterrorist: Am 21.05.2018 veröffentlicht: Wahrscheinlich vorerst das letzte Video, nachdem alle Beweise bei der Hausdurchsuchung am 15.5 beschlagnahmt worden sind, werd ich jetzt bestimmt verhaftet.“

  • Anti-Spy: Ultrasonic and Acoustic Noise Generator 360 by Santor


    Anti-Spy: Ultrasonic and Acoustic Noise Generator 360 by Santor

  • Inventor of the Water Engine for Vehicles was killed. Competition-Prevention by Corp. Crime Cartel/Pentagon Inc./Global Oil-Mafia/NWO.


    Inventor of the Water Engine for Vehicles was killed. Competition-Prevention by Corp. Crime Cartel/Pentagon Inc./Global Oil-Mafia/NWO.
    /
    „The nature of Satan is one-sided: Jesus to the Supreme Governor Cyrenius: If a force in a free-governing entity by stubborn endeavor wants to silence all opposing forces, this force kills itself to a certain extent. Because it clears all opportunities out of the way in which its power could have become expressed. However, a force without corresponding counterforce is – as already mentioned – no force at all. Such a self-absorbed force always seeks to capture even more powers in order not to be alone in its painful prison. – And that’s what you call Satan or devil. (Jakob Lorber)
    /
    Das Wesen Satans ist einseitig: Jesus zum Oberstatthalter Cyrenius: Wenn sich eine Kraft in einem sich frei regelnden Wesen durch hartnäckiges Bestreben alle Gegenkräfte zum Schweigen bringen will, tötet sich diese Kraft gewissermaßen selbst. Denn sie räumt alle Gelegenheiten aus dem Weg, bei denen sie ihre Kraft hätte äußern können. Eine Kraft jedoch, ohne entsprechende Gegenkraft, ist – wie schon gesagt – gar keine Kraft. Solch eine sich selbst gefangene Kraft hat dann auch immer das Bestreben, noch mehr Kräfte in sich gefangenzunehmen, um in ihrem schmerzlichen Gefängnis nicht allein zu sein. – Und das ist es nun, was man Satan oder Teufel nennt. (Jakob Lorber) [4575]




    „Inventor of the Water Engine for Vehicles Dies Screaming: They poisoned me !!“
    “HYDROGEN OBTAINED FROM SIMPLE WATER IS THE BEST FUEL OF THE FUTURE THAT CAN BE USED IN THE ECONOMY AND CAN SOLVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM AT THE SAME TIME”
    „STANLEY MEYER RIP“
    „Numerous inventors of the modern era have ridiculed the current energy model of oil by showing that we can live without oil by obtaining all the energy we need from other sources that hide us as water, air or magnets. Unfortunately, most of these inventors have innocently made the same mistakes over and over again by finishing their bones in jail or underground.
    Many people will have no idea who is Stanley Meyers, but with this post we will pay tribute to him as he was the first inventor who managed to patent a new source of energy equivalent to Oil, making him walk with normal water (the tap) a car, that is, got a car (or car) to work with water, instead of gasoline. Stanley Meyer made several patents and worked for NASA. He was also elected inventor of the year in 1993.
    His system consisted of breaking the water molecule based on positive pulses at several kilovolts at frequencies between 10 and 15 kilohertz. The mixture is injected into the engine and combustion only produces water again.
    Meyer even claimed that his circuit can work without needing to add more water, since the one that exits through the exhaust pipe is recycled. The cost of the transformation is less than the fuel needed for the life of the engine would cost. 7.4 microliters of water are needed for each explosion to get 50 HP. It happens that water contains 2.5 times more energy than gasoline.
    Unfortunately, Stanley Meyer’s life was suspended one day while he was having dinner with his brother (twin) and a couple of Belgian investors.
    The purpose of the dinner was supposedly the celebration of his work, the vehicle that worked with water, which was already patented. Everything was fine, until Meyer drank from his cup of cranberry juice. Suddenly, he began to choke, and he grabbed his neck touching as he ran out of the dining room vomiting violently. While dying in the arms of his brother, his last words were: “They poisoned me” .
    Although the cause of death was officially classified as a cerebral aneurysm, it is incredibly suspicious that his last words seemed to be an assassination attempt.
    Next, a “List” of Inventors of water engines that ended up imprisoned or mysteriously “silenced”:
    Daniel Dingel , Filipino, ran his cars with water -> sentenced in 2008 at 82 years of age to 20 years in prison (news in daily enquirer of the Philippines).
    Paul Pantone , American, inventor of the Pantone engine running with 80% water -> convicted in court and locked in a psychiatric hospital.
    John Kanzius , American, discovered how to convert salt water from the sea into fuel -> he died 6 months later.
    Nikola Tesla , Croatian, probably the greatest inventor of FREE and FREE ENERGY systems in history -> died denigrated in misery, the vast majority of his patents on free energy have disappeared.
    Arturo Estévez Varela , Spanish, operated his motorcycle with water before a notary in Seville, donated his patents to the Spanish state -> his patents are missing from the patent office, Arturo was never heard from again.
    Some of the mistakes made by the inventors were the following:
    Patenting the revolutionary invention and claiming to own rights-> error
    Offer the invention to a company that finances it -> error
    Appear on television and press proclaiming his invention -> error
    Try to convince a politician of his revolutionary invention -> error
    Donate the invention to a State or Government for the common good -> error
    Jealously guarding their knowledge, documents and plans of their inventions for themselves and take them to the grave when they are killed-> THE GREATEST ERROR
    We hope that these points are used as a reflection for current and future inventors who wake up to reality, be smarter and not fall into the same death trap.
    “WHEN YOU HAVE A REVOLUTIONARY INVENTION, BEFORE LOOKING AT WHO BENEFITS, REMAIN ATTENTIVE TO THE POWER THAT HAS THE ONE WHO HARMS”
    ALBERTO VÁZQUEZ FIGUEROA
    In the XXI century, we have a tremendous global problem with pollution engine oil, there are simple and cheap solutions that make our engines in hybrid hydrogen mostly water vapor ejected greatly reducing pollution ( hidrocarecologico.com ) or spend directly to water or air motors such as the model of the Indian brand TATA. Do you know what was the solution applied by many of our governments to pollution? : create taxes on CO2 emissions.“
    Source: https://mysteriousthing.com/inventor-of-the-water-engine-for-vehicles-dies-screaming-they-poisoned-me-videos

  • Graphene water filtration system could even remove nuclear radiation


    „Graphene water filtration system could even remove nuclear radiation
    Graphene, the first two-dimensional material ever discovered, is being incorporated into water filtration systems to produce results far beyond what is currently possible.
    The graphene water filtration system is being developed in a project between the National Graphene Institute (NGI) at The University of Manchester and LifeSaver, the creator of the first portable water filter that could remove even the smallest known waterborne viruses.
    It is hoped that it could help save more lives by providing disease-free water.
    LifeSaver hopes to reduce the sieve size of its ‘hollow fibre filtration membrane’ from 15 nanometres to less than three nanometres using graphene.
    Even at 15 nanometres, the filtration removes bacteria, microbial cysts and viruses, but at the smaller size, the filters would remove more contaminants, including heavy metals, pesticides, some chemicals and, potentially, nuclear radiation.
    Graphene is one of the strongest known materials
    The 18-month research project will see the material incorporated into existing LifeSaver technology, showcasing graphene’s wide-reaching potential across a host of industries.
    As well as being a two-dimensional material, made up of a single layer of atoms, graphene is one of the strongest materials to be discovered.
    Researchers at NGI have led the way with graphene membranes, which have high levels of flexibility, conductivity and crucially filtration.
    This has already led to some commercially available products, including shoes containing graphene.
    Applying graphene to water filtration systems
    The UK-founded LifeSaver arrived on the scene after the massive natural disasters of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004.
    Its products became known as a solution to drinking water issues in the humanitarian sector and also among outdoor enthusiasts. However, it’s partnership with NGI has the potential to create unprecedented water cleaning solutions beyond what is currently possible.
    “Making a graphene-based portable water filter was our dream, and this collaboration with LifeSaver will enable that dream to be a reality sooner than later,” said Professor Rahul Nair, who will lead the project at The University of Manchester.
    “The University of Manchester is the world-leading centre for graphene membrane development, and LifeSaver has the expertise in making a portable water filter. This is a great example of a collaborative project where we are trying to combine two independently developed technologies into one, to enhance the quality and availability of drinking water for those who need it most.”
    “The partnership with NGI excites all of us at LifeSaver as it provides a potentially game-changing opportunity in our patented technology platform,” said Chris Marsden, chairman at LifeSaver.
    “This, in turn, allows us to continue to provide leading edge technological solutions to our key global humanitarian, military and retail markets.”“
    Source: https://www.verdict.co.uk/graphene-water-filtration-system/

  • Doctor Says We Now Share Our Planet With New Species Of Humans – Alien UFO Sightings


    „Doctor Says We Now Share Our Planet With New Species Of Humans – Alien UFO Sightings“
    „She says very candidly that …the Western society is literally spiritually dumb yeah that perhaps not of their own accord but have been made to be so … so what I think we’re talking about is a broader genetic modification or a DNA modification..“
    they’re an upgraded biological container and they’re operating much faster their frequency is much faster..they have to be slowed down..
    . they’re exceedingly intelligent versus everybody
    else so is there is there an additional modification going on with them and if so how is that happening? Well, I talked
    about this in the book in the sense that those that have had experiences today we’re going we’re actually going to be
    operating at a faster speed it’s like a difference of the old computer compared to the the modern fiber-optic computers
    it means it’s that kind of difference right and so that’s
    you know why we’re seeing them as dysfunctional, because they just can’t operate in this slow system because they’re geared to that other higher frequency and whatever and and that’s where we’re all going..they’re showing us how what we’re evolving into they’re part of the new wave of showing
    the new human but we also have the capacity to join them all we need to do is get activated because we’ve still
    we’ve got all got same DNA we’ve all got the ability to access all of that it’s just for us we’re more switched off.“
    „Hold on a minute that’s that person that’s not me because that’s the biggest difficulty with an empath is knowing the difference between their own energy and feelings and understand what they’re tuning into so it’s like us we all have to learn how to walk a certain way so we don’t fall over you know they’re having to manage energies and understand you know whoever yes they
    struggle and yeah they’ll get frustrated so we’ve got to understand there we’re showing them this much of reality in this and they’re yeah they’re retrofitting themselves into a backward.
    .. they are human they may be new human but they’re human than the last and I know that for those of us who are seeing a very broken world and I was saying to someone yesterday at the event it seems that many of us have one foot on one planet one on another just in our mindset and how we operate .. how on earth on earth do they reconcile ..talk about a schism or cognitive dissonance yeah .. dealing with the majority on the planet who are so switched off yes still and yet they know so much more they’re being misunderstood that frustration they may be having for that reason they’re getting fed drugs because of the misunderstanding in how are they dealing with that psychologically Mary?
    Well.. some don’t…were saying oh for goodness sake you get into the you know the real world and forget all of that stuff it’s just your imagination you know stop being so silly and whatever so he said to me Mary I tried I tried to be 3d he said and I got to the point where it made me so depressed just thinking this was all there was that I wanted to end it I wanted to die and he said
    and I thought to myself well if being in 3d is gonna make me want to die if I want to hang around I’m gonna have to go back to my greater reality even if it’s difficult I need I’d rather do that because at least it gives me a reason to live…ten-year-old said I don’t want to be on this planet, it’s too hard..cases that this rise may be coming from these new children that just can’t
    bear to stay on this planet and they succeed in leaving.. I think it’s that but I also think that they all bullied because other children oh yeah I will see them differently when they sense
    their Energy’s different so they’re are very good at in Tooting somebody who’s a bit different and I think they do pick on them as well…give the child the space to be who they are to tell us what they need, so they can be all they can be so we’re doing we’re being taught by them we can help them manage the 3d world which is what they gonna need…3d but they’re going to teach us what we need to know about their reality so that we can also then be taken along with them, so the school is a reverse of everything we know about education, it literally is a reverse.“
    „According to her, there’s an increase in the number of young children who claim to be aliens, and this is independent of contact with the media. In fact, this new human race derives from abductions and alien experiments, something that Rodwell could indirectly witness through the regression therapy sessions she had held with many patients that had been abducted by aliens. The experiences they shared were good enough evidence for the researcher to believe that a new species of humans is living among us.
    According to Rodwell, “They are upgraded. They have the ability to think and reason way above the curve. The children had a lot more conscious awareness of multi-dimensional experiences. While their parents were afraid of the experiences relayed by the children, the children spoke naturally of their experiences.”
    One thing that distinguishes these people from the rest of us is the different perception they have of the world. Rodwell believes that a number of conditions including Asperger’s and ADHD these children are diagnosed with are in fact a sign of hidden abilities directly resulting from genetic manipulation by a technologically-advanced alien race.
    Should this prove true, the so-called ‘junk DNA’ in our genome could provide a range of cognitive functions that have never been studied by science. Unlike past decades, today we have much more information relative to these syndromes. However, we have a lot more to learn as we still have no evidence how one gene influences another and how deep the roots go. Generally speaking, modern science hasn’t yet reached the level where it can fully understand and explain the subtle mechanism through which life constantly upgrades.
    The Human Genome Project’s Prof. Sam Chang, one of the first specialists to promote the idea that junk DNA is of extraterrestrial origin, is of the same opinion.
    According to him, “These alien sequences have their own systems and resist certain drugs.”
    Although evolution largely depends on adaptation, these processes take thousands of years to become a standard. Taken that there is such a wide gap between two successive generations, the only reasonable explanation is that there must be an external factor accountable for this manipulation of the human genome.
    What we are still wondering about is whether all of humanity will eventually become activated to a ‘higher intelligence’ when the aliens arrive. Or we’ll become museum exhibits alongside the Neanderthals we made extinct with our bigger brains and appetites. And most importantly, are we driving ourselves towards the end of us as a result of our desires?
    The video below provides the answers to some of these questions.“
    Source: https://alien-ufo-sightings.com/2018/08/doctor-says-we-now-share-our-planet-with-new-species-of-humans/
    „Sabrina Davie: vor 1 Woche: I´m 46 I´ve always been empath …intuitive…my past has been blank slated …I´ve felt lost till I got into Q and learned deepstate had us at a low frequency to keep us dumb down ..ive been listening to higher frequencies now ive been seeing stuff in sky I feel my place on earth now.
    Celé Gleeson: vor 1 Jahr: one of the best interviews i have ever heard. Thank you.
    San JABBOUR: vor 4 Wochen: Brilliant.. And just the way it is: creating a brand new reality.
    David Wenbert: vor 2 Monaten: At the juncture of Mary Rodwell’s work and David Jacobs‘ is the information we need to know for humanity to survive the coming recognition of the ET presence among us.
    Carolyn: vor 10 Monaten: This is very true. Starseeds are not only a spiritual phenomena but its also a genetic one. My younger sister whom i suspected was a starseed, told me recently that she was not native to this planet with no prompting from me. That she knew she was an ET here to help and that she knows i am one too.. Totally blew me away. We both agreed that our parents were not though. Both are Star Terrans which makes relating to them very difficult. They are about as 3D as you can get.
    Regine Lee: vor 6 Monaten: I also hate this world. But have ever people ask the soul – Why we need to be here at first? The soul had been cheated saying this world is fine and good. Only evil here since ancient. Do the soul have choice in freewill or being force to be born here…..
    D.MYST: vor 1 Jahr: Hmm I was one of those children classified as strange..I haven’t changed much as an adult and during my entire life I’ve always felt pressure to slow down and conform. My parents had me in immense therapy and I felt no one ever listened.
    J k: vor 1 Jahr: Jesus christ! I srongly believe this. aliens had cloned and implanted their genes in us….
    Troy Taylor: vor 1 Jahr: I’ve written extensively what has been shared with me in my own experiences which have been quite psychic, quite spiritual, touching, informative including multiple escort trips out of my body, both flying and being on ships! I am 57 , worked in dentistry all my life, so I don’t know about this new human!! I’ve seemed to manage my life better than those around me to the point I have few friends because none of them can keep up and get resentful, jealous even! My IQ is staggering compared to others. I didn’t know! that I was as surprised as everyone. But not everyone can quit work at 38 because they wanted to, and not everyone can be debt free like me because I know few others that express the freedom we have in my family. I just thought everyone saw, I mean really see but you’d have to see to know what I mean and it’s not just high match and physics it’s explained to me that all of this is one, one organism, one singular being, and this universe and the space before you is alive, it’s mental!!. If anyone is interested find the Magnificent Framework and read it. It was shared with me outside this normal paradigm we live in on the everyday plane! Once you see it that is my blog.
    Sir Adonai: vor 7 Monaten: The Golden Race is a possibility within all life forms. Consciousness is the „source field“ that created matter, time, and everything we see and experience — as well as circumstances. It is inherent in every metaphysical and supernatural phenomena that we have witnessed. These are simply aspects of reality that have always been there and always will be there. It is only that humans (and other species) which are returning to source, traveling many different paths — that is „The Way“ or Tao.
    Languages of Lights: vor 2 Jahren: Harmony ~ Synchronicity.
    Johnny Little: vor 1 Jahr: Surreal to have two ladies who are professionals working through unprofessional and fringe world.
    It’s so refreshing and feels like I’ve come back to reality,….the real new one.
    Oom2Move: vor 2 Jahren: All of this will be common knowledge one day, and then what…? Existence is just one big classroom? No more struggles, battles, mysteries? Once we are all like little Buddhas, sitting in bliss on mountain tops, then what?
    cantcomprehend1: vor 2 Jahren: If these things are so bloody fantastic and helpful and friendly, why then do they chose to scare the shit out of people when they take them out of their beds at night ???… you lot are completely lost in your own bullshit !!.. But in the end you will know the truth.“

  • Wie man den Staatsschutz anzeigt.

    „Wie man den Staatsschutz anzeigt.“

  • Want to live forever? You just have to make it to 2050

    „Want to live forever? You just have to make it to 2050“
    „By Sean Keach, Digital Technology and Science Editor | The Sun
    The human brain evolved to have two halves — and a new review of previous research suggests that this dual design may confer special benefits.
    „If you’re under 40 reading this article, you’re probably not going to die unless you get a nasty disease.“
    Those are the words of esteemed futurologist Dr. Ian Pearson, who told The Sun he believes humans are very close to achieving „immortality“ – the ability to never die.
    Humans have been trying to find a way to dodge death for years.
    Ancient Greek alchemists tried to create a „philosopher’s stone“ that would let people live forever, but humans have yet to beat death.
    However, Dr. Pearson tells The Sun that there are a number of different ways we could live forever – as long as you can make it to the year 2050.
    If you kick the bucket before then, you might be part of the last generation of humans to die of old age.
    Method #1: Renewing your body parts
    „There are quite a lot of people interested in living forever,“ explains Dr. Pearson. „There always has been, but the difference now is tech is improving so quickly, lots of people believe they can actually do it.“
    He reveals that one way to extend life would be to use bio-technologies and medicine to „keep renewing the body, and rejuvenating it“.
    „No one wants to live forever at 95 years old, but if you could rejuvenate the body to 29 or 30, you might want to do that.“
    This could be done in several ways, including genetic engineering that prevents (or reverses) the ageing of cells.
    Alternatively, you could replace vital body organs with new parts.
    Many scientists around the world are working on creating human organs using 3D printers loaded with living cells, which could one day make human organ donors redundant.
    Method #2: Living in android bodies
    But Dr. Pearson thinks it’s much more likely that we’ll extend our lives a different way: robots.
    „A long time before we get to fix our bodies and rejuvenate it every time we feel like, we’ll be able to link our minds to the machine world so well, we’ll effectively be living in the cloud,“ he explains.
    „The mind will basically be in the cloud, and be able to use any android that you feel like to inhabit the real world.“
    He says that in 50 years time, we might be able to hire an android anywhere in the world „just like a hire car“, and upload your consciousness into it.
    „If you wanted to spend the evening in Australia, going to the Sydney opera house, you could use an android.“
    This means that even when your original bodies dies, you’d still be able to use your digital mind – stored on a computer – and live in the world using highly realistic robot bodies.
    „The current state of sex dolls are starting to look quite human-like. Give them another 30 years of development and they’ll be extremely human-like,“ Dr. Pearson reveals.
    „You can take any android body and they will look human-like, and download whatever mind you want. You could share one with someone else, or have one yourself, or own dozens of them.
    „You might even have ones of different genders and different ages, some old, young, female, male – there might be new genders by 2050 as well, so several other ones you can pick too.“
    He explains that we’ll have to wait until around „2045, 2050“ before we’ll be able to create these strong brain-to-machine links, and says the cost will be very high initially.
    The first people to use robot bodies to become immortal will be the rich, but then „the price will gradually come down.“
    One day your body dies – maybe you get hit by a bus or a nasty disease – but it doesn’t matter, because your mind will still be there. You’ll be able to use an android body instead of the organic one you just lost.
    For normal people on everyday salaries, it’s more likely that you’ll have to wait a little longer.
    Immortality on the NHS
    „By 2060, people like you or I will be able to buy it, and by 2070 people in poor countries on modest incomes will be able to buy it.
    „Everyone will have a chance to have immortality, a sort of electronic immortality.
    „After 10, 15, 20 years, the price comes down to hundreds of pounds, rather than millions.
    „It could be provided as part of the NHS. You might be able to buy premium offerings on a private subscription, or you might get a basic presence on a network and be allowed to use an android body.“
    Dr. Pearson says we’ll have to limit the number of android bodies people can own, however.
    „You might be given one free on the NHS, but you might be limited to no more than two or three.
    „Rich people that can afford it would probably want to have loads of different bodies, and if your mind is online, there’s nothing to stop them replicating it millions of times over.
    „You wouldn’t want to live in a world where there are millions of Kardashians walking around, where they can afford to do it and nobody else can.
    „We would need to limit the number of bodies for environmental impact.
    „Imaging taking everybody in the UK. Once the economics allows everyone to have 10 bodies each, there would be 600 million people living here.“
    Method #3: Living in a virtual world
    But if our minds are online, do we even need robot bodies? We could all just live in a computer simulation quite happily, according to Dr. Pearson.
    „You could spend most of your time online in the virtual world, of course anywhere in the world on any computer.
    „If you’re online all the time, you could have a fantastic life online. It would be all virtual, so you could have anything you want. 72 virgins if that’s what drives you; all of that, because it’s totally imaginary.
    „You could make as much fun as you could possibly imagine online. You might still want to come into the real world.
    You could link your mind to millions of other minds, and have unlimited intelligence, and be in multiple places at once.
    The cut-off – holding on for dear life
    The tricky bit is surviving until the technology becomes widely available.
    „By 2050, it will only really be for the rich and famous.
    „Most people on middle-class incomes and reasonable working-class incomes can probably afford this in the 2060s. So anyone 90 or under by 2060.
    „If you were born sometime in 1970 onwards, that would make you 48 this year. So anybody under 50 has got a good chance of it, and anyone under 40 almost definitely will have access to this.
    „Most of your readers are probably going to live forever,“ Dr. Pearson tells us.
    This story originally appeared in The Sun.
    https://www.foxnews.com/science/want-to-live-forever-you-just-have-to-make-it-to-2050″

  • Amazon, Google and Facebook Have Taken Over The World And Are Now A Threat To Our Very Existence

    „Amazon, Google and Facebook Have Taken Over The World And Are Now A Threat To Our Very Existence“
    „Below, we´ll take a closer look at some of their more controversial practices:
    1. Amazon
    People usually think Amazon is an e-commerce business, but that´s just one part of a much larger picture. For example, Amazon Web Services has hundreds of government agencies as customers.
    The most infamous of them being the CIA, with which Amazon has had a 10 years contract to build private cloud servers inside CIA data centers. For this, the CIA paid Amazon $600 million.
    „Jeff Bezos, founder and chief executive officer of Amazon.“
    Is Alexa a Spying Device?
    Amazon´s Echo (and known colloquially as „Alexa“) came under scrutiny after a family told KIRO 7 that their Amazon device recorded a conversation they were having in their home, and sent it to a random contact.
    The contact then alerted them to the fact that he had heard everything they said and sent the couple the email he had received with the audio files.
    “My husband and I would joke and say I’d bet these devices are listening to what we’re saying,” Danielle said, noting that they never imagined the smart device would record their private conversations and then make them public.
    After unplugging all of the devices, Danielle said she called Amazon multiple times before she received a response.
    When an Alexa engineer finally looked into Danielle’s claims, she said he acknowledged that the device had recorded conversations inside her home and emailed them to a random contact.
    Which begs the question „is Amazon´s Alexa, actually, a spying device?“
    Amazon´s Facial Recognition Technology
    According to an article published by the Ron Paul Institute, “Amazon is also seeking profit from selling to government agencies facial recognition technology that can aid in conducting mass surveillance.“
    According to a resolution filed by Amazon shareholders, they „are concerned Amazon’s facial recognition technology (“Rekognition”) poses risk to civil and human rights and shareholder value.
    Civil liberties organizations, academics, and shareholders have demanded Amazon halt sales of Rekognition to government, concerned that our Company is enabling a surveillance system
    “readily available to violate rights and target communities of color.” Four hundred fifty Amazon employees echoed this demand, posing a talent and retention risk.
    Brian Brackeen, former Chief Executive Officer of facial recognition company Kairos, said, “Any company in this space that willingly hands [facial recognition] software over to a government,
    be it America or another nation’s, is willfully endangering people’s lives.””
    2. Google
    Upon hearing the name „Google“, most people think of the search engine. Very few people actually understand how dangerous the company has become.
    Google is intimately involved with the Military Industrial Complex, in the development of surveillance (i.e. spying) technologies, face recognition and real-time tracking.
    Google´s Facial Recognition Technology
    You can learn more about Google´s facial recognition technology right from the horse´s mouth:
    Image source: Cloud.google.com
    And that´s just barely scratching the surface.
    Google is Working on Robots for the DoD
    Back in 2013, Google has acquired Boston Dynamics, a military robotics contractor best known for projects that were funded by DARPA, which is part of the Department of Defense (DoD).
    About 11 years ago, Boston Dynamics has uploaded the following video of „Big Dog“ — one of their advanced robotics projects, — and it looks creepy, to say the least:
    You can easily imagine an army of similar robots being weaponized and deployed against foreign or domestic enemies of the state. And that´s just one of the many similar projects that Boston Dynamics is currently working on.
    The following is a review of Black Mirror´s „Metalhead“ episode, where you can make an idea of how Boston Dynamics´ robots can be weaponized:
    As a matter of fact, the „sins“ of Google are so many that it would require an entire article dedicated to the subject.
    Google Engages in Censorship: The giant is so heavily invested into censorship, pushing coordinated agendas, and „book burning“ techniques, that it is often compared to Orwell´s Ministry of Truth.
    According to investigative reporter Jon Rappoport, who was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize and was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California,
    Google is already turning into the dystopian Ministry of Truth.
    More and more people in the awakened community are worried that the very survival of our species is being threatened by Google´s agenda of complete domination.
    Is Google Home A Spying Device?
    Just as Amazon Echo/Alexa, Google Home is also suspected of being a spying device:
    “Google and Amazon executives want you to think that Google Home and Amazon Echo are there to help you out at the sound of your voice. In fact, they’re all about snooping on you and your family in your home and
    gathering as much information on your activities as possible,” said John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy and Technology Project Director, in a news release.
    “You might find them useful sometimes, but think about what you’re revealing about yourself and your family, and how that information might be used in the future.”
    Digital home assistants like Google Home and Amazon Echo may be listening to you at all times, according tot he products´ own patent information.
    Consumer Watchdog unveils its new report on the patent applications for digital home assistants which reveal unsettling intentions for audio surveillance:
    Google is an „Existential Threat to Humanity“
    WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, stated last year that Google and Facebook have become an „existential threat to humanity“.
    According to Dr. Joseph Mercola, „Google is undoubtedly one of the largest and clearest monopolies in the world.“
    Recently, Google has partnered with the Chinese government in an effort to create a state-controlled search engine that crushes human freedom.
    The Chinese government has recently come under scrutiny for its dictatorial ´Social Credit System´, which tracks and rates how obedient the Chinese people are based on their social behavior, political views, shopping lists
    and even the friends that they have. Over 12 million people have recently been banned from travelling because of their low credit score.
    One way China rates its citizens, is by keeping a close eye on them.
    Is this dictatorial model going to be implemented worldwide?
    3. Facebook
    Facebook is the social media network where most people like to spend hours every single day. Unfortunately, only some of them understand the grim implications of uploading their pictures onto the platform,
    or filling out their profiles with personal details.
    In an article entitled „Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites are an elaborate CIA spying scheme“, Ethan A. Huff writes:
    „Social media portals like Facebook and Twitter are increasingly being exposed as what appear to be bait-and-switch spying networks funded, and potentially even run covertly, by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and other government agencies.
    Venture capital firm that ensured Facebook´s success linked to CIA front group.
    When Facebook was first getting off its feet, it turns out, the company received a huge cash injection from a venture capital firm known as Accel Partners. According to reports, Accel´s head, James Breyer, was a former chairman at
    National Venture Capital Association, where he served on the board with Gilman Louie, the CEO of another venture capital group known as In-Q-Tel.
    According to In-Q-Tel´s „Mission“ page, the group, which invested nearly $13 million during Facebook´s early days, was first launched in 1999 as a catalyst for keeping the CIA up-to-date with the latest information-gathering technologies.
    Not surprisingly, the primary purpose of In-Q-Tel is to „build relationships with technology startups outside the reach of the Intelligence Community,“ and partner with private sector groups who are willing to „co-invest in [its] portfolio companies.“
    If you connect the dots here, it becomes clear that Breyer´s expertise is in connecting the CIA with private enterprises like Facebook and Twitter that focus on gathering information, whether it be for marketing or some other purpose.“
    Facebook Engages in Censorship
    Just as Google and its video-sharing website, YouTube, Facebook also engages in censorship.
    According to RT News, „some 800 anti-establishment accounts and pages have been yanked from Facebook in a sweeping crackdown the social media giant framed as a fight against spammers.“
    Among the hundreds of pages and accounts Facebook and Twitter took down were those both on the political left and right, ranging from [so called] conspiracy theorists and police brutality watchers, to news outlets with non-mainstream angles.
    Is Facebook a CIA Database?
    In an interview with RT News, Wikileaks´ creator, Julian Assange has made some very worrying observations about Facebook (as well as Google and Yahoo). While reading Assange´s words, please keep in mind that WikiLeaks has a 100% accuracy record:
    „Facebook in particular is the most appalling spying machine that has ever been invented. Here we have the world´s most comprehensive database about people, their relationships, their names, their addresses, their locations, their communications
    with each other, their relatives, all seating in the United States, all accessible to US intelligence.
    Facebook, Google, Yahoo, all these major US organizations, have built in interfaces for US intelligence.
    Everyone should understand that when they add their friends to Facebook, they are doing free work for United States intelligence agencies, in building this database.“
    You can watch the interview below:
    Facebook´s Facial Recognition Software
    Every time you upload a photo to Facebook, you´re not only helping intelligence agencies to expands their photographic records of you, but you´re also helping Facebook perfect their facial recognition software.
    Enter the ´10 year challenge´…
    “Imagine that you wanted to train a facial recognition algorithm on age-related characteristics and, more specifically, on age progression (e.g., how people are likely to look as they get older). Ideally,
    you´d want a broad and rigorous dataset with lots of people´s pictures. It would help if you knew they were taken a fixed number of years apart — say, 10 years,” said Kate O’Neill, a writer for Wired.
    And now, let´s discuss the biggest threat of all…
    Amazon, Google and Facebook — All Three Heavily Invested Into Artificial Intelligence (A.I.)
    In an article titled „AI experts list the real dangers of artificial intelligence“, Dave Gershgorn discusses a 100-page report written by artificial intelligence experts from industry and academia, which has a clear message:
    Every AI advance by the good guys is an advance for the bad guys, too.
    The paper, titled “The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation,” calls this the “dual-use” attribute of AI, meaning the technology’s ability to make thousands of complex decisions every second
    could be used to both help or harm people, depending on the person designing the system.
    Technology reporter for The Washington Post, Peter Holley, wrote an article back in 2015 detailing the concerns of some of the biggest names in tech regarding AI:
    Elon Musk, for example, stated that AI is „our biggest existential threat“. He was quoted saying:
    „I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I were to guess like what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. So we need to be very careful with the artificial intelligence.“
    British inventor Clive Sinclair has said he thinks artificial intelligence will doom mankind.
    „Once you start to make machines that are rivaling and surpassing humans with intelligence, it´s going to be very difficult for us to survive,“ he told the BBC. „It´s just an inevitability.“
    Bill Gates also agrees.
    „I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence,“ Gates wrote.
    „First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern.
    I agree with Elon Musk and some others on this and don´t understand why some people are not concerned.“
    Last year, Elon Musk has doubled down on his warnings:
    „The biggest issue I see with so-called AI experts is that they think they know more than they do, and they think they are smarter than they actually are,“ said Musk.
    „This tends to plague smart people. They define themselves by their intelligence and they don´t like the idea that a machine could be way smarter than them, so they discount the idea — which is fundamentally flawed.“
    „I am really quite close, I am very close, to the cutting edge in AI and it scares the hell out of me,“ said Musk. „It´s capable of vastly more than almost anyone knows and the rate of improvement is exponential.“
    Musk is so worried about AI, that he even proposed that the development of artificial intelligence should be regulated, even though he admits he´s not „normally an advocate of regulation and oversight.“
    „Mark my words, AI is far more dangerous than nukes. Far. So why do we have no regulatory oversight? This is insane,“ Elon Musk stated.
    In an article entitled „How Google Aims To Dominate Artificial Intelligence,“ Dave Gershgorn writes:
    „Internally, Google has spent the last three years building a massive platform for artificial intelligence and now they’re unleashing it on the world. Although, Google would prefer you call it machine intelligence.
    They feel that the word artificial intelligence carries too many connotations….“
    Facebook´s artificial intelligence robots shut down after they start talking to each other in their own language:
    Conclusion
    The above are just some of the facts that make Amazon, Google and Facebook some of the most evil and dangerous companies in the world.
    You´ve probably noticed that the three giants have a lot of negative traits in common, such as working on facial recognition technology, which can (and probably is) being used for surveillance (i.e. spying) purposes;
    all three companies have strong connections with the US intelligence agencies, as explained by Julian Assange.
    But the most worrying part is that all three companies are investing heavily in Artificial Intelligence, even though some of the brightest tech minds have issued warnings about the dangers presented by unregulated AI.
    „Mark my words, AI is far more dangerous than nukes. (Elon Musk)“
    “
    Source: http://humansarefree.com/2019/02/amazon-google-and-facebook-have-taken.html