https://t.me/conspiracyrevelation/13514 (backup channel only / nur ein Backup Channel)
(also blocked by NWO-Fed-Store, I’m just noticing it now. / auch vom NWO-Fed-Store blockiert, fällt mir jetzt erst auf.) (accessible via Web-Telegram)
„Obama & Putin Breakfast – No comment“
„12.375.759 Aufrufe
08.07.2009“
„PACMANTVUK: vor 1 Jahr: All that food and nobody ate anything. This is why I have trust issues.“
„Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin
4.176.056 Aufrufe
02.10.2018“
„I am an independent journalist. And that’s an animal that is disappearing in Russia
and not only in Russia.“
„I’d like to say, first of all, that we are, at an extremely dangerous moment today.
Never have the relations between Russia and the United States with the Soviet Union,
not what it was before, been at this level. During the worst times of the Cold War,
when I was living in the Soviet Union, and I remember all that very, very well.
Russians were anti White House, Anti-Wall Street, but not Anti-American, in their vast majority.
In fact, there was a kind of a warm feeling, these are the Americans.
Today that’s different. Today it’s Anti-American at the grassroots level.
And there’s a reason for it. Another thing that is, to me scary is that neither side seems to be afraid
of nuclear weapons. 30 years ago, those of you who are of my age
certainly remember an American movie called „The Day After,“
which is about what happens to you and to your country
after a nuclear strike.
There was fear of these weapons
as there was in the Soviet Union, there was a realization
that these weapons can and if used will destroy our country.
Today, there’s a feeling when you talk to people,
it’s as if there are no nuclear weapons.
It really doesn’t seem to play a role in how we act.
And the danger of a not a deliberate nuclear exchange,
but an accidental one has grown because the level of mistrust between the two countries has grown as well.
There have been several times in the past when computers warned of a nuclear attack.
But it never got to the real thing, because people took the time to really check it out.
Now, they didn’t have a long time. If an ICBM is launched from Russia, it will take about 10 minutes for it to hit the U.S. So you know, and vice versa obviously. So you don’t have a long time but you do have some.
But my feeling is that if today those same computers malfunction and it’s on either side,
that an attack has been launched, the response would be immediate.
…
And in such a really short period of time,
how did this happen?
Why are we at the point that we are today?
And I’m not saying who’s to blame..“
„And let me say, just for the record, Russia never in its entire thousand years,
never had democracy, completely absent.“
„It later was incorporated in something that was officially called the Bush Doctrine.
That document was leaked to the New York Times.
And so it became public.
And what it basically said, and you can look it up,
it’s available, you know, just go to Wolfowitz Doctrine, and you’ll find it, what it basically said was this.
The United States should never again allow any other country to challenge it.
The United States must remain the superior country.
And we should tell our allies not to worry about developing their own weapons,
because we will do that for them.
And we must watch out for Russia, because we don’t know which way it’s going to go.
The bear might get up on his hind legs again, and growl.“
„Hillary Clinton said that Putin was a former KGB agent and had no soul and compared him to Hitler.“
„So I think that if there is a desire on both sides to change that attitude, it can be done very quickly.
And that’s why I say that we’re manipulated. We are manipulated.
And we all say, well, I’m totally independent. It’s not true, we make our decisions, and we come to certain conclusions because of what we read,because of what we see and because of what we hear.
So, basically, that’s it. I would say that certainly the internet allows us to get a much broader picture.
In fact, we could communicate with the other side via the internet. It’s not happening very much, but it is a little bit.
So that the, how should I put this, the ordinary citizen could do a lot to change what’s happening in both countries,
and it’s a two way street. And I think it’s people like you, that is to say of your age, they’re the ones who for me, are the reason for optimism because you can do this. Whereas people of my age (84) and slightly younger,
can do far less. So I would hope that, you know, what I’ve said today might lead you to look into this.“
„So that’s what I’m saying that we in a strange way corporate censorship is just as effective and sometimes
far more sophisticated than government censorship.“
„How do we stop people from killing each other in situations like that?“
„How can United States and Germany and Russia get together and stop brothers from killing brothers?“
„And, you know, people are killing each other in many places, in Africa, for instance,
brother’s killing brother and so on. And this is going on everywhere. But I would say that if the leaders of Russia, of Ukraine, of the United States, of Germany, were actually asking that question.
That question they were asking. I think they’d find a way to answer it.
But I don’t think they’re asking that question.
I think they’re asking very different questions.
And they have very different aims.
And that’s why this is going on.
So, to me, the answer is pretty obvious.
How you make people do that, that’s a different question.
Why is it that egoistic geopolitical interests take first place over these things.
That’s the real question.“
„Skripal, he was a military agent, right?
He worked for the former GRU, not for the KGB,
Putin work for the KGB, he works for the GRU,
which is military intelligence,
and they can’t stand the KGB,
and the KGB can’t stand their intelligence.
That’s normal competition.
So, and he betrayed his country.
Let’s face it, right.
He went over to the other side and began to work
for British intelligence.
And he was caught, and he was tried.
And he was sentenced to 13 years.
Now, I don’t know if you’re familiar with what happens
to spies, who to turn against their own country,
and are then caught?
Well, in wartime, they’re shot.
But in peacetime, well, it’s usually something
like 30 years, 25, 13 is a weird sentence.
Not only does he get this rather short sentence,
considering, but he’s exchanged for Soviet,
excuse me, Russian spies who were caught.
Now if he was exchanged that means
that he really didn’t know anything at that point.
He was no danger to the Russian side.
So, you know, let him go and we’ll get ours back.
Now, if Putin, Putin doesn’t like traders, who does?
If Putin wanted to kill him, he was in prison, he would do it.
And you could say that he had a heart attack or that he committed suicide or whatever.
He was no problem killing when he was in jail in Russia.
They let him go, they exchanged him, they could have exchanged someone else,
they exchanged him.
What sense would it make to poison this man under those circumstances, I mean logically.
Putin is anything but stupid. Not stupid, it’s very risky.
The risk of somehow this being found out is always there.
Why do it, this is not a dangerous person.
He can’t do anything.
He can talk about what he knows, but it’s over.
So I try to find, I’m not saying he didn’t do it.
I’m saying I’m trying to find some kind of logic,
logic, not emotions, logic as to why Putin would be involved
in something like that.
Alright, it’s not Putin.
It’s one of those lower, you know, one of the GRU
who think that Putin would like it if they did it
But would Putin like it if it was discovered?
No, of course not, they get their head chopped down.
So why would they risk it?
They’re not gonna get decorations for doing it.
Because if Putin had ordered it, then yes.
So why would they do it?
So to me, it really remains a mystery.
Because it’s stupid, it’s counterproductive.
It doesn’t do anything positive at all.
So am I denying anything?
I’m not denying, I’m saying give me proof.
Please, just show me, yes, there it is.
Now this interview, did you see it?
The interview of Rita, what’s her name?
Sonya, of those two two people.“
„Who is that man in Dresden?
MASHA GESSEN – Well, he’s an unhappy man.
He has wanted to be a secret agent all of his life, as long as he can remember, and
he was—waited patiently for his foreign posting.
Then he gets posted to East Germany, and not even to Berlin, to Dresden, which is just
such a backwater, and his job in Dresden isn’t even to spy on the East Germans.
His job in Dresden is actually to try to work remotely to get intelligence from the West.
So he’s working with students in Dresden who might have friends who are students in
Berlin, and his big “get” during his entire time in Dresden is buying a 700-page unclassified
U.S. Army manual.
„The Putin Files: Masha Gessen“
„That’s all he’s managed to do.
Another thing that’s happened to him is that he’s experienced envy like I think
he didn’t expect.
The fact that he recounted it nearly 20 years later, when he was already a wealthy man,
but you know, they got to Dresden, and East Germany was not terribly exciting or glamorous
or wealthy place by any means, especially Dresden, which had been, you know, virtually destroyed in the bombings in 1945. So here is this bland city, and still he sees that East Germans, ordinary East Germans live
better than a KGB officer in the Soviet Union.
They all have their own separate apartments. They have washing machines in their apartments.
They have color televisions. All these things are luxury in the Soviet Union.
His parents still live in a communal apartment.
He’s never had a washing machine in the house, an automatic washing machine, that
sort of thing.
So he’s a very unhappy man.
He’s drinking a lot of beer, getting fat and wiling away his time uselessly.
Meanwhile, back home, things start happening as soon as he left the country.
The country started to transform, which is something that no one could have predicted,
because it felt, you know, that era in Soviet history is known as the era of stagnation.
It just felt like time had stopped.
People were living in sort of horizontal time.
There was no future; there was no past.
Things were always going to be the same.
And suddenly Mikhail Gorbachev, who’s the new head of the Central Committee, the
sort of young person—he’s in his 50s—to have that post in generations, he comes out
and says: “We need change. We need transformation. We need perestroika.”
He says that word, and “glasnost.”
“Perestroika” is restructuring, and “glasnost” is transparency.“
„FRONTLINE PBS | Official
1,41 Mio. Abonnenten
Watch author and journalist Masha Gessen’s candid, full interview on Putin and allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election – part of FRONTLINE’s media transparency project for our investigation, “Putin’s Revenge.”“
„But people in the Soviet Union are completely caught up in the excitement of change, because
suddenly things can be said, things can be done.
Things that were unthinkable yesterday are entirely normal today, like having a demonstration
in the street, which first people sort of tried gingerly, and then they see that people
aren’t getting arrested, and then all of a sudden, there are thousands and hundreds of
thousands of people in the streets.
All of that excitement and all of that discussion that’s starting to happen out in public,
like “What should the state be like? Should there be one party, or maybe more than one party?,” That’s a radical idea; all
of that is happening back in the Soviet Union, and Putin has no way of knowing about it.“
„The thing about the Russian secret police and the Soviet secret police is that one never
leaves the secret police.
Once a KGB man, always a KGB man.
It seems that probably Putin’s father maintained some connection to the secret police throughout
his life.
One sign of that is that they had a telephone, and people didn’t have telephones in the
Soviet Union in the 1950s…and never would somebody have a personal phone inside a communal apartment,
which is what Putin’s dad had.“
„MASHA GESSEN – He’s scrappy, very ambitious, very, very greedy.
This is actually an extraordinary trait of his, something that he has talked about.
He doesn’t call it greed, but the behavior he describes is so atypical for a Soviet boy
or a young man that it really stands out.“
„Russischer Soldat: «Niemand dachte, dass wir töten sollen» Am 25. Februar 2022“
News
Europa
„Eine russische Truppe musste sich in der Ukraine ergeben. Wie ein gefangener russischer Soldat jetzt sagt, habe er nicht mit einem Kriegseinsatz gerechnet.
Ukraine Konflikt
Ukrainische Soldaten an der Frontlinie in der Region Donezk. – AFP
Das Wichtigste in Kürze
Russische Truppen sind in der Ukraine einmarschiert.
Ein russischer Aufklärungszug musste sich nun im Land ergeben.
Ein gefangener Soldat erzählt, er habe nicht damit gerechnet, Menschen töten zu müssen.
Im Zuge des Konflikts in der Ukraine hat sich eine ganze russische Truppe ergeben müssen. Ein Aufklärungszug der 74. motorisierten Gewehrbrigade hielt sich in der Nähe von Tschernihiw, rund 100 Kilometer von Kiew entfernt, im Norden des Landes auf.
Auf Facebook postete der ukrainische Generalstabschef Valerii Zaluzhnyi ein Foto eines verwundeten Soldaten. Dieser soll sich nun in ukrainischer Gefangenschaft befinden.
ukraine konflikt
Dieses Bild postete der Generalstabschef Valerii Zaluzhnyi auf Facebook. – Facebook / @CinC AF of Ukraine
Wie dem Post zu entnehmen ist, rechneten die Soldaten nicht mit einem Kriegseinsatz. «Niemand dachte, dass wir töten sollten. Wir sollten nicht kämpfen, sondern Informationen sammeln», meinte der abgelichtete Mann.
Die Truppe umfasste rund 40 russische Soldaten, die in Jela im Westen Russlands ausgebildet worden sind. Nach Angaben des Generalstabschefs hätten die Soldaten erst am Mittwoch vom Angriff auf die Ukraine erfahren.
„Telegram may restrict some channels if situation in Ukraine escalates, says founder“
„MOSCOW, Feb 27 (Reuters) – Messaging app Telegram may consider partially or fully restricting the operation of some channels if the situation in Ukraine escalates, Telegram founder Pavel Durov said on Sunday.
Durov said in a post that Telegram channels were increasingly becoming a source of unverified information and that he did not want the app to be used as a tool that may deepen conflicts.“
„Union calls for suspension of rapid testing after toxic substance found“
„By Elias Hazou – October 26, 2021“
„A union representing the rights of public-sector workers has called for the suspension of rapid tests for the coronavirus, after media reports showed a swab contained multiple times the permissible trace level of ethylene oxide, a toxic substance.
The Isotita (Equality) union said rapid tests – which under current protocols thousands of people need to take every 72 hours for work – should be immediately discontinued until health authorities have investigated the matter and determined any health risks.
Citing the European Chemicals Agency, the union said ethylene oxide – a substance used to coat and sterilise PCR and rapid test nasal swabs – is toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic even when inhaled.
Ethylene oxide is a gas commonly used to sterilise many different types of medical devices, including swabs used in test kits. Ethylene oxide (EtO) gas sterilisers have been used by hospitals for over 40 years to sterilise surgical equipment and supplies that are heat sensitive or that cannot tolerate excessive moisture.
Use of the substance is banned in food production in the EU. Under EU Regulation No. 2015/868, the maximum residue level for the sum (of ethylene oxide and the conversion product 2-chloroethanol), referred to as ethylene oxide, has been specified at 0.05 mg/kg.
The Isotita union’s concerns come after a report aired two days ago on media channel Pronews TV, about a rapid test swab found to contain 0.36 mg/kg of ethylene oxide.
The analysis, done by Larnaca-based Food Allergens Lab, had set the detection limit at 0.025 mg/kg.
The analysis result – which reads “Swab” – is dated October 21.
The health ministry did not put out a statement on the matter. The Cyprus Mail tried contacting a ministry spokesperson for a comment, but she could not be reached in time for this report.
Back in August, health authorities ordered a recall of a number of foodstuffs on the market found to contain ethylene oxide, but said at the time that trace amounts pose no direct danger to human health.
The ministry had then said that the very low levels of ethylene oxide detected in certain batches of foodstuffs – donuts and ice creams – pose no direct danger to human health, “however based on scientific studies it is assessed that frequent consumption on a long-term basis, even with trace amounts of ethylene oxide, increases the risk of developing cancer.”
It had cited a European Commission decision that the level of ethylene oxide warranting recall of a foodstuff is “that minimum amount of ethylene oxide that is detectable during analysis of a foodstuff.”
Under EU standards, a food product may be recalled from the market “even where a single ingredient in the foodstuff is shown to be tainted with ethylene oxide at the lowest level detectable, including where the ingredient in question comprises the smallest part of the foodstuff percentage-wise.”
As such, the ministry added at the time, “there is absolutely no cause for alarm among people who may have consumed a foodstuff that has been recalled.”
„Is the Great Reset Failing? When Great Narratives Fall Apart…“
„Joaquin Flores
February 24, 2022
The WEF’s newest release “The Great Narrative” with its fixation on ‘fake news’ is as much an admission of guilt as it is recognition of failure.“
„A funny thing happens when corporate culture becomes indistinguishable from government culture. Corporatized governments promote and grant authority to those ‘ambitious’ individuals who can best over-sell and over-promise results.
…
At first glance it doesn’t really matter that these aims are unattainable. But it does matter…
Ambitious leaders in league with the IMF/WEF were onboard with this, knowing full well the consequences.
…
Narratives are just ‘stories in our heads’. But if these are shared with broader communities, real or virtual/digital, then they are reinforced and become part of reality.
..
The WEF and the IMF it works for have a grand plan for the future – the technocratic aims of which are by now thoroughly understood.
…
In other words, the public has been resisting illegal legislation and shattering the narrative which justifies it, and so resetism itself is in danger of failure.
This much has meant the organic development of a counter-narrative, one that resonates with increasing layers in affected societies. Big tech oligarchs have done their part in trying to police, punish, and silence this counter-narrative.
Elites have fallen into a vicious cycle, as the populist counter-narrative is proven in part by that very censorship and repression. The more they push, the weaker they become.
… „Each time the ‘regime’ attempts to make some ‘show of strength’, the counter-narrative prevails as mass publics understand that ‘shows of strength’ are derived from crises of strength and actual weakness.“
Freedom, like love, come from places of strength. Dictatorship, like fear, come from a place of losing control. And power is like water, the more you grasp at it, the faster you lose it.
The absolute panic is palpable.“
…
They can then use state-of-emergency laws to enact these solutions into law, or into practice. So much of actual life takes place in the private sphere, that simple collusion and agreement between corporate chiefs on police is already enough to take the place of government and law…“
