Kategorie: Brainwashing/Gehirnwäsche

  • Präsident Trump: Ich werde die Vereinten Nationen daran hindern, eine „Weltregierung“ zu bilden

    „Präsident Trump: Ich werde die Vereinten Nationen daran hindern, eine „Weltregierung“ zu bilden“
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Wh21XnBt1U&
    Conspiracy Revelation: 4.7.2019: Iesus vs Rockefeller U.N.

  • Aufgedeckt: Merkel ist Tavor-süchtig – Zitteranfälle sind (nicht) die Folge der Medikamentensucht (falsche Diagnose (anm. 2025))-Rev 2.0

    „Aufgedeckt: Merkel ist Tavor-süchtig – Zitteranfälle sind Folge der Medikamentensucht“ (Anonymous (CIA-Subfaktion) redet auch oft Quatsch….) Anm. 28.7.2025. Revision 2.0.
    „Für die Zitteranfälle von Angela Merkel gibt es jetzt eine schlüssige Erklärung. Ein Insider packt aus und spricht gegenüber anonymousnews.ru von Medikamentenabhängigkeit. Die deutsche Regierungschefin schlucke große Mengen an Tavor, einem starken Beruhigungsmittel, so die Informationen aus ihrem engeren Umfeld. Auch andere Verhaltensweisen Merkels lassen sich mit einer Abhängigkeit von Tavor erklären.
    von Roscoe Hollister
    Die ganze Republik spricht derzeit über Merkels Zitteranfälle. Verschiedene Theorien, teils seriöser anmutend, teils völlig abstrus, wurden zu den Gründen bereits angestellt. Nun hat das große Rätselraten ein Ende. Ein Insider aus dem engeren Umfeld Angela Merkels meldete sich bei anonymousnews.ru und verrät: Die Kanzlerin ist medikamentenabhängig! Der Grund für die Ausfallerscheinungen heißt Tavor. Der Pharmahersteller Pfizer schreibt auf seiner Webseite über das Medikament in der geringst verfügbaren Dosierung von 0,5 mg des Wirkstoffes:
    „Tavor 0,5 mg ist ein beruhigendes und angstlösendes Arzneimittel (Tranquilizer) aus der Wirkstoffgruppe der Benzodiazepine. (…) /// Lorazepam hat eine suchtfördernde Eigenschaft (primäres Abhängigkeitspotenzial). (auch Quatsch, Vorwand um Folteropfern die Hilfe durch Ärzte zu verweigern, stattdessen, verschreiben sie dann Tabletten, die teilweise Tödlichkeitspotential haben. Revision 2.0 – 28.7.2025)  /// Wenn Merkel das Medikament zur Beruhigung – immerhin steht sie seit ihrer illegalen Grenzöffnung im Jahre 2015 massiv unter Druck – eingesetzt hat, dann ist die Abhängigkeit bereits vor längerer Zeit eingetreten. Wie der Hersteller verrät, bewirken die Inhaltsstoffe „eine dosisabhängige zentralnervöse Dämpfung“ mit der Folge von „Beruhigung (Sedierung), Müdigkeit, Benommenheit“.
    Ist Ihnen auch schon aufgefallen, wie oft Merkel im Bundestag quasi völlig teilnahmslos und weggetreten auf ihrem Stuhl sitzt? Haben Sie die öffentlichen Auftritte der Kanzlerin in der letzten Zeit einmal aufmerksam verfolgt? Immer wieder gewinnt man den Eindruck, sie stünde unter dem Einfluss von Alkohol und/oder Drogen. Sie spricht und agiert teilweise extrem langsam, wirkt völlig weggetreten. All das bestätigt die Insider-Information bezüglich ihrer Medikamentensucht.
    Als weitere mögliche Nebenwirkung wird vom Hersteller auch das Zittern angegeben. Insbesondere beim Absetzen des Medikaments treten laut Pfitzer unter anderem „Krampfanfälle/Krämpfe, Zittern, Bauchkrämpfe, Muskelschmerzen, Erregungszustände, Herzklopfen, beschleunigter Puls, Panikattacken, Schwindel“ auf. Hat Merkel also versucht, auf eigene Faust Ihrer Abhängigkeit zu entkommen? Die Bilder der beiden Zitteranfälle der Kanzlerin sprechen jedenfalls eine eindeutige Sprache. Auch eine Spezialklinik für die Therapierung von Suchtkranken warnt davor, die Einnahme des Medikaments auf eigene Faust abrupt zu beenden:
    „Der Wirkstoff Lorazepam sollte nie plötzlich abgesetzt werden. Schließlich kann der kalte Entzug in vielen Fällen zu lebensgefährlichen epileptischen Anfällen führen, den sogenannten Grand mal-Anfällen mit tonischer und klonischer Komponente.“
    Kommt Ihnen das bekannt vor? Der Konsum von Tavor scheint in der CDU eine gewisse Tradition zu haben. Schon ein gewisser Uwe Barschel, einstiger Ministerpräsident von Schleswig-Holstein war massiv von der Substanz abhängig. Der Politiker, der mutmaßlich ein Doppelleben führte, schien massive innere Ängste zu haben, die er mit Medikamenten zu überwinden versuchte. Dazu schrieb der Stern:
    Wie hoch der Druck gewesen sein muss, ist auch an dem Mittel zu erkennen, das Barschel dagegen einsetzte: Tavor, ein starker Tranquilizer, deutlich stärker als Valium. // Alle paar Wochen musste der Hausarzt ein neues Rezept für Barschel ausstellen. 1980 hatte der Politiker mit zwei Milligramm täglich begonnen, schluckte zwei Jahre später schon die anderthalbfache Menge und hatte im Herbst 1987 eine durchschnittliche Tagesdosis von 10,4 Milligramm erreicht.  //
    Barschels Leben endete übrigens am 11. Oktober 1987 vorzeitig. Er wurde in der Badewanne seines Zimmers im Genfer Luxushotel „Beau-Rivage“ tot aufgefunden. Bis heute ist das Ableben des CDU-Politikers nicht endgültig aufgeklärt. Selbstmord gilt mittlerweile als ausgeschlossen. Viel wahrscheinlicher ist, dass Uwe Barschel durch einen Geheimdienst ermordet wurde.“ (100% gekillt worden!!! )
    Quelle: https://www.anonymousnews.ru/2019/07/02/zitteranfaelle-angela-merkel-tavor-medikamentensucht/

  • KREBS: Keine "Krebszellen", sondern Parasiten

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6vvITwd1Pw
    „KREBS: Keine „Krebszellen“, sondern Parasiten.“
    Conspiracy Revelation: 1.7.2019: Daher sprühen sie auch wie wild Leicht- und Schwermetalle, pathogene Protozoen und Pilztoxine (u.v.m.) per Chemtrails, in der EU seit ca. 1999, ganz zu schweigen von der Nanotechnologie, um die Entzündungsrate und den Parasitenfaktor zu erhöhen (und natürlich, um die Leute auf dem Radar besser zu sehen)..Gezielte Volkssabotage, bis hin zu lang geplantem Völkermord durch die Pharma-Militärische-Geheimdienstmafia und die NWO. Dazu noch die Strahlungswerte massiv erhöht, überall auf der Welt, durch die Mobilfunkmafia und die militärischen Strahlungssysteme.
    Vergesst nicht, dass sie in den militärischen Untergrundbunkern (DUMBs), jeden Virus und jeden Parasit in 2 Minuten mit Medizizinischen-KI-Betten sofort entfernen können und das schon seit Jahrzehnten, das wird der ignoranten Bevölkerung verwehrt.
    Also massive unterlassene Hilfeleistung durch die Staatsmafiosis, stattdessen das Benutzen von Steinzeitmethoden, die den total falschen Ansatz liefern. Rockefellers Genozidtrick wird komplett blossgestellt.
    „Sie frisst jährlich Milliarden, und dennoch, heute sterben weit mehr Menschen an Krebs, als noch vor hundert Jahren, die
    Krebsforschung ist definitiv die erfolgloseste Wissenschaft aller Zeiten. Hierzu Statistiken: Vor 100 Jahren lag
    die Krebskrankheit auf dem achten Rang tödlicher Krankheiten, mit drei prozent aller Todesfälle, heute, im Jahre 2000 liegt die Krebskrankheit bereits auf Platz zwei über 20 prozent der Gesamtsterblichkeit und die Krebsforschung selber sieht für 2020 voraus, dass Krebs dann der Killer Nummer 1 sein wird. Die Krebsforschung schämt sich dessen nicht, nein, sie verkündet diese Prognose, als sei man auch noch besonders stolz
    darauf ist.“
    „Es ist schwer nachvollziehbar, dass ein Jahrhundert hochbezahlter Krebsforschung die Krankheit nicht kontrollierbarer macht, die Todesstatistiken
    beweisen, dass irgendetwas in der Krebsforschung grundlegend falsch läuft, aller Aufwand verpufft wie in einem Fass
    ohne Boden.“
    „Die internationale Krebsforschungs befindet sich sozusagen noch in der Steinzeit, nicht willens sich der Neuzeit anzupassen…aber von Robert koch vermuteten Parasiten längst sichtbar.“
    „Der Artikel basiert auf einer von Professor Übrigen finanzierten in Experimentalreihe und legt zwingend nahe, dass eine große Anzahl von Patienten parasitäre Mikroben im Blut habe, eine Volksseuche war entdeckt doch maß offenbar niemand diesem Umstand Bedeutung bei, das heißt Professor Übrigen hätte sein Geld ebenso gut aus dem Fenster schmeißen oder es verbrennen können… ..eine parasitäre Blutinfektion.“
    „In der Ecke links unten ein rotes Blutkörperchen, in dessen
    inneren sich wie vor einem Fenster lebhafte Mikroparasiten zeigen.“
    „Es gibt kein Tumorgewebe ohne diese Mikroben.“
    „Es gibt kein Blut krebskranker ohne diese Mikroparasiten.“
    „Der Nachweis ist relativ leicht zu führen für jeden
    Dunkelfeld-Therapeuten.“
    Mit meinem Dunkelfeldmikroskop das zu überprüfen und habe
    festgestellt, dass diese Methode tatsächlich funktioniert..“
    „Dies übrigens mit relativ einfachem Aufwand, benutzt wurde ein Dunkelfeldmikroskop mit 500facher Vergrößerung, gefilmt wurde mit einer Digitalkamera im Makrobereich…“
    //
    „Die Krebsforschung glaubt seit 100 Jahren stur an das von Virchow eingeführte Dogma der „bösartigen Krebszellen“. Seitdem stieg Krebs auf Nr. 2 der Todesursachen und wird 2020 zur Nr. 1 – und wird damit die Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen von der Spitze ablösen. Bis heute haben die Krebsforscher keine überzeugende Krebsursache vorzulegen vermocht, so dass auch nicht ursächlich therapiert werden kann. Jedes Jahr werden vielversprechende neue Medikamente und Therapien vorgestellt und gleichzeitig erkranken jedes Jahr mehr Menschen an Krebs und sterben daran.
    Während Schulmediziner einhellig der Meinung sind, dass Krebs und Tumore aus entarteten Körperzellen entstehen, so hat die russische Chemikerin Tamara Lebedewa eine ganz andere Theorie entwickelt: Sie hält nach dreizehn Jahren intensiver Arbeit an Krebszellen einzellige Parasiten für die Verursacher der Krankheit. Ihre Familie ist an Krebs gestorben. Tamara Lebedewa aus Moskau wollte nicht akzeptieren, dass sie und ihr Sohn auch irgendwann dieser schrecklichen Krankheit zum Opfer fallen. Also fing die Wissenschaftlerin an zu forschen und untersuchte Zellen unter dem Mikroskop. Was sie entdeckte, erstaunt heute viele Naturmediziner und Heilpraktiker. Krebszellen verhalten sich genauso, wie ein den Gynäkologen altbekannter einzelliger Parasit, die Trichomonia urogenitalis’.
    Vor allem die begeißelten Trichomonaden weisen laut Lebedewa in vielerlei Hinsicht sehr große Ähnlichkeit zu Krebszellen auf, wohingegen sie sich von den gesunden menschlichen Körperzellen in unzähligen Eigenschaften unterscheiden: So beispielsweise im Stoffwechsel sowie in dem Teilungs- und Wachstumsverhalten.
    Da die sehr resistenten Trichomonaden von der Größe her den menschlichen Zellen ähnlich sind, können sie darüber hinaus leicht im Organismus übersehen werden. Es ist aber erwiesen, dass sie in Mund, Darmtrakt und den Geschlechtsorganen überleben können.
    Lebedewa, deren Bücher teilweise ins Deutsche übersetzt wurden, ist davon überzeugt, dass sich die Parasiten erst dann in gefährlich wuchernde Krebszellen verwandeln, wenn dies durch Gifte, Medikamente oder das Alter ausgelöst wird.
    Da die Trichomonaden sich, laut Tamara Lebedewa, in ihrem Aussehen an das umliegende Gewebe anpassen können, werden sie von den Medizinern fälschlicherweise für wuchernde Körperzellen gehalten. „Wie kann es sein“, fragt die Wissenschaftlerein, „dass das so komplizierte Gen in der menschlichen Zelle bei Millionen an Krebs leidenden Menschen immer gleichermassen beschädigt werden soll mit immer der gleichen Auswirkung: eine Zelle richtet sich gegen den Körper und fängt an, sich durch diesen zu fressen, will ihn umbringen!“.
    Falls diese Theorie stimmt, so hat das entscheidende Auswirkungen auf die Behandlung von Krebspatienten: Denn die Trichomonaden werden nur dann vom Organismus durch Zysten oder Kalkablagerungen isoliert, wenn das Immunsystem intakt ist. Sobald aber durch Chemotherapien oder Antibiotika der Körper geschwächt wird, können die Parasiten sich ungehindert ausbreiten.
    Gleiches geschieht durch Operationen, beispielsweise wenn eine Wucherung entfernt wird. Denn Lebedewa geht davon aus, dass der Tumor nicht die eigentliche Krankheit ist, sondern der Versuch des Körpers, sich vor den Trichomonaden zu schützen. So sieht sie beispielsweise in der Metastasenbildung das Bemühen des Organismus, die Einzeller erneut zu isolieren.
    Chemotherapien hingegen hält sie nicht nur für wirkungslos gegenüber den Trichomonaden, sondern sogar für krebsfördernd, da diese die körpereigenen Abwehrkräfte schwächen.“
    „Ärzte melden sich jetzt zu Wort, die nach umfangreichen Beobachtungen und Studien zu ähnlichen Ergebnissen kommen. So berichtet zum Beispiel die Süddeutsche:
    „Dass Krebs auch durch Viren und Bakterien ausgelöst werden kann, ist weit weniger bekannt. Noch exotischer erscheinen krebserregende Parasiten. Doch weltweit geht etwa jeder fünfte Krebsfall auf das Konto von Krankheitserregern, schätzt Harald zur Hausen, ehemaliger Direktor des Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrums in Heidelberg (DKFZ), der jetzt ein Buch zum Thema geschrieben hat (Infections Causing Human Cancer, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006). „Die Rolle von Infektionen für die Krebsentstehung wird unterbewertet“, sagt zur Hausen.“
    Das, was der Chemikerin Tamara Lebedewa auffiel, ist keineswegs neu. Der Verdacht, dass Krebs auch durch Erreger wie Bakterien und Viren und Parasiten ist gut hundert Jahre alt.“
    „Mediziner vermuten, dass Entzündungsprozesse bei der Tumorbildung mitwirken. Dass es tatsächlich mit dem Egel zu tun haben muß, zeigt sich daran, dass Im Nildelta, wo Männer die Feldarbeit leisten, Blasenkrebs gehäuft bei ihnen vorkommt, Dagegen wo überwiegend Frauen auf den Feldern arbeiten, ist es umgekehrt. Die Schistosoma-Larven leben nämlich in stehenden Gewässern und infizieren Menschen, die auf bewässerten Feldern arbeiten.
    Wesentlich bekannter ist, dass das Bakterium Helicobacter pylori nicht nur Magengeschwüre erzeugt, sondern auch zu Magenkrebs führen kann. Die Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) listet das spiralförmige Bakterium als Karzinogen der höchsten Gefahrenklasse auf. …“
    Quelle: https://connectiv.events/krebs-das-wichtigste-video-keine-krebszellen-sondern-parasiten-2/
    „Critical-News.tv
    Am 15.05.2017 veröffentlicht
    In folgendem Video wird belegt, daß „Krebs“ nicht auf sog. „bösartige Zellen“ zurück zu führen ist, wie die milliardenschwere Krebsindustrie behauptet, sondern auf Parasiten und somit eine Infektionskrankheit ist.
    Es wird ebenfalls gezeigt, daß Chemotherapie und Bestrahlung den „Krebs“ langfristig sogar fördern können.
    Diese Erkenntnis ist fundamental, da Krebs somit durchaus heilbar und vermeidbar ist, insbesondere durch die Stärkung des körpereigenen Immunsystems, beispielweise durch die möglichst vegane Ernährung…
    Danksagung an den Urheber:
    Aus „Der Krebs-Bankrott“ von ARTV – Berlin (C) 2003 – 2008″

  • The Making of a Monster: We’re All Lab Rats in the Government’s Secret Experiments


    „The Making of a Monster: We’re All Lab Rats in the Government’s Secret Experiments“
    “But these weren’t the kind of monsters that had tentacles and rotting skin, the kind a seven-year-old might be able to wrap his mind around — they were monsters with human faces, in crisp uniforms, marching in lockstep, so banal you don’t recognize them for what they are until it’s too late.” — Ransom Riggs, Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children
    The U.S. government, in its pursuit of so-called monsters, has itself become a monster.
    This is not a new development, nor is it a revelation.
    This is a government that has in recent decades unleashed untold horrors upon the world — including its own citizenry — in the name of global conquest, the acquisition of greater wealth, scientific experimentation, and technological advances, all packaged in the guise of the greater good.
    Mind you, there is no greater good when the government is involved. There is only greater greed for money and power.
    Unfortunately, the public has become so easily distracted by the political spectacle coming out of Washington, DC, that they are altogether oblivious to the grisly experiments, barbaric behavior and inhumane conditions that have become synonymous with the U.S. government.
    These horrors are being meted out against humans and animals alike.
    It’s heartbreaking enough when you hear about police shooting family dogs that pose no threat — beloved pets that are “guilty” of little more than barking, or wagging a tag, or racing towards them in greeting — at an alarming rate somewhere in the vicinity of 500 dogs a day.
    What I’m about to share goes beyond heartbreaking to horrifying.“
    „It’s not just animals that are being treated like lab rats by government agencies.
    “We the people” have also become the police state’s guinea pigs: to be caged, branded, experimented upon without our knowledge or consent, and then conveniently discarded and left to suffer from the after-effects.
    Back in 2017, FEMA “inadvertently” exposed nearly 10,000 firefighters, paramedics and other responders to a deadly form of ricin during simulated bioterrorism response sessions. In 2015, it was discovered that an Army lab had been “mistakenly” shipping deadly anthrax to labs and defense contractors for a decade.“
    „While these particular incidents have been dismissed as “accidents,” you don’t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation’s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace — citizens and noncitizens alike — making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins.“
    „At the time, the government reasoned that it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society such as prisoners, mental patients, and poor blacks.
    Conspiracy Revelation: 30.6.2019: Nowadays this black is white….blacks are protected and whites become subjected to bioweapon research tests – in Germany – and utterly cruel and ai-driven brutal remote torture attacks / remote suffocation attacks / sleep deprivation attacks / neuroweaponized and terror satellite based process control attacks etc..etc.. (2005-2011-2012-2013-2015-2017-2018), especially German People…Due to the Hooton-Plan and the Zion-Nazi-Insanity to take over the planet…and their fear that Germany could become too powerful or owns the God-High-End-Intelligence-Genome is still in their deluded and paranoid evil infected minds…the worst factor is that all these traitors against Germany have eventually (at least) 50% German Roots..this is valid for most Ruling Crime Cabal Families…this is the worst case scenario of treason. A deceptive shifted hate projection out of pure fear, competitive thinking and cowardice. They know they stand no chance against Gods truly chosen ones.
    In Alabama, for example, 600 black men with syphilis were allowed to suffer without proper medical treatment in order to study the natural progression of untreated syphilis.
    In California, older prisoners had testicles from livestock and from recently executed convicts implanted in them to test their virility. In Connecticut, mental patients were injected with hepatitis.
    In Maryland, sleeping prisoners had a pandemic flu virus sprayed up their noses. In Georgia, two dozen “volunteering” prison inmates had gonorrhea bacteria pumped directly into their urinary tracts through the penis.
    In Michigan, male patients at an insane asylum were exposed to the flu after first being injected with an experimental flu vaccine. In Minnesota, 11 public service employee “volunteers” were injected with malaria, then starved for five days.
    In New York, dying patients had cancer cells introduced into their systems. In Ohio, over 100 inmates were injected with live cancer cells.
    Also in New York, prisoners at a reformatory prison were also split into two groups to determine how a deadly stomach virus was spread: the first group was made to swallow an unfiltered stool suspension, while the second group merely breathed in germs sprayed into the air.
    And in Staten Island, children with mental retardation were given hepatitis orally and by injection to see if they could then be cured.
    As the Associated Press reports, “The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries, accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations. By the 1960s, at least half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs … because they were cheaper than chimpanzees.”
    Moreover, “Some of these studies, mostly from the 1940s to the ’60s, apparently were never covered by news media. Others were reported at the time, but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures, while glossing over how test subjects were treated.”
    Media blackouts, propaganda, spin. Sound familiar?
    How many government incursions into our freedoms have been blacked out, buried under “entertainment” news headlines, or spun in such a way as to suggest that anyone voicing a word of caution is paranoid or conspiratorial?
    Unfortunately, these incidents are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the atrocities the government has inflicted on an unsuspecting populace in the name of secret experimentation.
    For instance, there was the U.S. military’s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men.
    As NPR reports:
    “All of the World War II experiments with mustard gas were done in secret and weren’t recorded on the subjects‘ official military records. Most do not have proof of what they went through. They received no follow-up health care or monitoring of any kind. And they were sworn to secrecy about the tests under threat of dishonorable discharge and military prison time, leaving some unable to receive adequate medical treatment for their injuries, because they couldn’t tell doctors what happened to them.”
    And then there was the CIA’s MKULTRA program in which hundreds of unsuspecting American civilians and military personnel were dosed with LSD, some having the hallucinogenic drug slipped into their drinks at the beach, in city bars, at restaurants.
    As Time reports, “before the documentation and other facts of the program were made public, those who talked of it were frequently dismissed as being psychotic.”
    Now one might argue that this is all ancient history and that the government today is different from the government of yesteryear, but has the U.S. government really changed?
    Has the government become any more humane, any more respectful of the rights of the citizenry?
    Has it become any more transparent or willing to abide by the rule of law? Has it become any more truthful about its activities? Has it become any more cognizant of its appointed role as a guardian of our rights?
    Or has the government simply hunkered down and hidden its nefarious acts and dastardly experiments under layers of secrecy, legalism and obfuscations? Has it not become wilier, more slippery, more difficult to pin down?
    Having mastered the Orwellian art of Doublespeak and followed the Huxleyan blueprint for distraction and diversion, are we not dealing with a government that is simply craftier and more conniving that it used to be?
    Consider this: after revelations about the government’s experiments spanning the 20th century spawned outrage, the government began looking for human guinea pigs in other countries, where “clinical trials could be done more cheaply and with fewer rules.”
    In Guatemala, prisoners and patients at a mental hospital were infected with syphilis, “apparently to test whether penicillin could prevent some sexually transmitted disease.” In Uganda, U.S.-funded doctors “failed to give the AIDS drug AZT to all the HIV-infected pregnant women in a study… even though it would have protected their newborns.”
    Meanwhile, in Nigeria, children with meningitis were used to test an antibiotic named Trovan. Eleven children died and many others were left disabled.
    The more things change, the more they stay the same.
    Case in point: back in 2016, it was announced that scientists working for the Department of Homeland Security would begin releasing various gases and particles on crowded subway platforms as part of an experiment aimed at testing bioterror airflow in New York subways.
    The government insisted that the gases released into the subways by the DHS were nontoxic and did not pose a health risk. It’s in our best interests, they said, to understand how quickly a chemical or biological terrorist attack might spread.
    And look how cool the technology is — said the government cheerleaders — that scientists can use something called DNATrax to track the movement of microscopic substances in air and food. (Imagine the kinds of surveillance that could be carried out by the government using trackable airborne microscopic substances you breathe in or ingest.)
    Mind you, this is the same government that in 1949 sprayed bacteria into the Pentagon’s air handling system, then the world’s largest office building. In 1950, special ops forces sprayed bacteria from Navy ships off the coast of Norfolk and San Francisco, in the latter case exposing all of the city’s 800,000 residents.
    Read: Did You Know U.S. Gov’t Conducted Bio-Warfare Experiments in San Francisco that Killed US Citizens?
    In 1953, government operatives staged “mock” anthrax attacks on St. Louis, Minneapolis, and Winnipeg using generators placed on top of cars. Local governments were reportedly told that “‘invisible smokescreen[s]’ were being deployed to mask the city on enemy radar.” Later experiments covered territory as wide-ranging as Ohio to Texas and Michigan to Kansas.
    In 1965, the government’s experiments in bioterror took aim at Washington’s National Airport, followed by a 1966 experiment in which army scientists exposed a million subway NYC passengers to airborne bacteria that causes food poisoning.
    And this is the same government that has taken every bit of technology sold to us as being in our best interests — GPS devices, surveillance, nonlethal weapons, etc. — and used it against us, to track, control and trap us.
    So, no, I don’t think the government’s ethics have changed much over the years. It’s just taken its nefarious programs undercover.
    The question remains: why is the government doing this? The answer is always the same: money, power and total domination.
    It’s the same answer no matter which totalitarian regime is in power.
    The mindset driving these programs has, appropriately, been likened to that of Nazi doctors experimenting on Jews. As the Holocaust Museum recounts, Nazi physicians “conducted painful and often deadly experiments on thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent.”
    The Nazi’s unethical experiments ran the gamut from freezing experiments using prisoners to find an effective treatment for hypothermia, tests to determine the maximum altitude for parachuting out of a plane, injecting prisoners with malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis, exposing prisoners to phosgene and mustard gas, and mass sterilization experiments.
    The horrors being meted out against the American people can be traced back, in a direct line, to the horrors meted out in Nazi laboratories. In fact, following the second World War, the U.S. government recruited many of Hitler’s employees, adopted his protocols, embraced his mindset about law and order and experimentation, and implemented his tactics in incremental steps.
    Sounds far-fetched, you say? Read on. It’s all documented.
    As historian Robert Gellately recounts, the Nazi police state was initially so admired for its efficiency and order by the world powers of the day that J. Edgar Hoover, then-head of the FBI, actually sent one of his right-hand men, Edmund Patrick Coffey, to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany’s secret police, the Gestapo.
    The FBI was so impressed with the Nazi regime that, according to the New York Times, in the decades after World War II, the FBI, along with other government agencies, aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis, including some of Hitler’s highest henchmen.
    All told, thousands of Nazi collaborators — including the head of a Nazi concentration camp, among others — were given secret visas and brought to America by way of Project Paperclip. Subsequently, they were hired on as spies, informants and scientific advisers, and then camouflaged to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler’s holocaust machine would remain unknown.
    All the while, thousands of Jewish refugees were refused entry visas to the U.S. on the grounds that it could threaten national security.
    Adding further insult to injury, American taxpayers have been paying to keep these ex-Nazis on the U.S. government’s payroll ever since. And in true Gestapo fashion, anyone who has dared to blow the whistle on the FBI’s illicit Nazi ties has found himself spied upon, intimidated, harassed and labeled a threat to national security.
    As if the government’s covert, taxpayer-funded employment of Nazis after World War II wasn’t bad enough, U.S. government agencies — the FBI, CIA and the military — have since fully embraced many of the Nazi’s well-honed policing tactics, and have used them repeatedly against American citizens.
    It’s certainly easy to denounce the full-frontal horrors carried out by the scientific and medical community within a despotic regime such as Nazi Germany, but what do you do when it’s your own government that claims to be a champion of human rights all the while allowing its agents to engage in the foulest, bases and most despicable acts of torture, abuse and experimentation?
    When all is said and done, this is not a government that has our best interests at heart.
    This is not a government that values us.
    Perhaps the answer lies in The Third Man, Carol Reed’s influential 1949 film starring Joseph Cotten and Orson Welles. In the film, set in a post-WW II Vienna, rogue war profiteer Harry Lime has come to view human carnage with a callous indifference, unconcerned that the diluted penicillin he’s been trafficking underground has resulted in the tortured deaths of young children.
    Challenged by his old friend Holly Martins to consider the consequences of his actions, Lime responds, “In these days, old man, nobody thinks in terms of human beings. Governments don’t, so why should we?”
    “Have you ever seen any of your victims?” asks Martins.
    “Victims?” responds Limes, as he looks down from the top of a Ferris wheel onto a populace reduced to mere dots on the ground. “Look down there. Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever?
    “If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money, or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax — the only way you can save money nowadays.”
    As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this is how the U.S. government sees us, too, when it looks down upon us from its lofty perch.
    To the powers-that-be, the rest of us are insignificant specks, faceless dots on the ground.
    To the architects of the American police state, we are not worthy or vested with inherent rights. This is how the government can justify treating us like economic units to be bought and sold and traded, or caged rats to be experimented upon and discarded when we’ve outgrown our usefulness.
    To those who call the shots in the halls of government, “we the people” are merely the means to an end.
    “We the people” — who think, who reason, who take a stand, who resist, who demand to be treated with dignity and care, who believe in freedom and justice for all — have become obsolete, undervalued citizens of a totalitarian state that, in the words of Rod Serling, “has patterned itself after every dictator who has ever planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history since the beginning of time. It has refinements, technological advances, and a more sophisticated approach to the destruction of human freedom.”
    In this sense, we are all Romney Wordsworth, the condemned man in Serling’s Twilight Zone episode “The Obsolete Man.”
    “The Obsolete Man” speaks to the dangers of a government that views people as expendable once they have outgrown their usefulness to the State. Yet — and here’s the kicker — this is where the government through its monstrous inhumanity also becomes obsolete.
    As Serling noted in his original script for “The Obsolete Man,” “Any state, any entity, any ideology which fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man…that state is obsolete.”
    How do you defeat a monster? You start by recognizing the monster for what it is.“
    „By John W. Whitehead — Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute“
    Source: http://humansarefree.com/2019/06/the-making-of-monster-were-all-lab-rats.html

  • Big Brother is keeping 'Five Eyes' on you

    Conspiracy Revelation: 29.6.2019: Very well written, countered and clarified.
    „Big Brother is keeping ‚Five Eyes‘ on you“
    „Just last week, the world’s leading snooping powers quietly and without notice issued a disturbing warning to tech giants, telling them to surrender unprecedented backdoor access to their citizens‘ data.
    Not many people know this, but the United Kingdom has some of the most extreme spying powers in the developed world. At the end of 2016, passing what some people called the „Snooper’s Charter,“ the UK put into law some of the most draconian anti-privacy laws that we have ever known, allowing its government to compel companies to break their own encryption.
    The UK plays a pivotal part in the so-called Five Eyes alliance, which also includes the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Nobody knew it at the time, but the American military base which my family and I grew up next to has played a crucial role in delivering US drone strikes across the Middle East and beyond. America’s drone-strike regime, largely considered illegal for numerous reasons, is not something that countries should willingly participate in lightly and without public scrutiny.
    Why am I mentioning this? Because it goes to the very heart of my point: the extent to which we know or do not know what our governments are doing behind closed doors is quite literally a matter of life and death.
    Now, it has been revealed that the Five Eyes alliance, dedicated to a global „collect-it-all“ surveillance task, has issued a memo calling on their governments to demand that tech companies build backdoor access for states to access users‘ encrypted data or face measures that will force companies to comply.
    ‘Five Eyes’ govt spy ring seeks laws to make big tech companies share encrypted messages.
    The memo was released quietly with little media coverage last week by the Australian Department of Home Affairs, and essentially demanded that providers „create customized solutions, tailored to their individual system architectures that are capable of meeting lawful access requirements.“ The memo was reportedly released after ministers for the intelligence agencies of the Five Eyes nations met on Australia’s Gold Coast last week.
    The most laughable aspect, of course, was the opening sentence, which ironically reads: the „governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are committed to personal rights and privacy, and support the role of encryption in protecting those rights.“
    Yes, of course. Also worthy of note is the order in which those countries appear in the memo, clearly ranking from biggest bully in the playground to the push-over child at school who is just happy and content to be a part of the „club.“
    If we are to take the memo at its face value, end-to-end encryption is potentially our best friend. The memo itself admits that some encrypted data is nearly impossible for intelligence agencies to crack on their own, as they are struggling to make sense of the data they are currently intercepting. This is why they are forcibly calling on the world’s leading tech providers to do their work for them.
    Will those tech companies cave in to these government’s demands? You can bet your bottom dollar that eventually, yes, they very well might. While Facebook did not comment directly on the memo, instead attempting to refer questions to a public blog that the social media giant published in May explaining its policies on encryption, there is one important ingredient missing from the future of these policies.
    After Donald Trump was elected in 2016, the US establishment and its media cohorts went into a „fake news“ frenzy that saw Barack Obama deliver a stern attack on Facebook directly, supposedly being one of the main disseminators of fake news. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s CEO and founder, completely dismissed the idea that Facebook played a substantial role in this… Despite this statement, hoping no one had noticed, barely a few days later, Facebook then announced it was adopting a string of measures to fight „fake news“ after all.
    You could soon spend 10 years in Australian jail if you don’t hand over your phone password to cops
    Why the sudden change in heart? Could it be that, according to the Washington Post, in that trivial space of time, Barack Obama personally pulled aside Zuckerberg in a private room, on the sidelines of a meeting of world leaders in Peru, so that the president could make a personal appeal to Zuckerberg to take the threat of „fake news“ more seriously?
    In other words, these big companies will always inevitably cave to government pressure whether or not they even agree with what these governments are saying. According to the New York Times, one Facebook official said that the Australian memo had „no teeth,“ but was in fact „part of an escalating war between governments and Silicon Valley tech giants over access to people’s private data.“
    In that context, the warnings speak for themselves. The companies who do not comply with these nations‘ demands will be hit with „technological, enforcement, legislative, or other measures to achieve lawful access solutions,“ according to the memo, which does not detail what sort of measures these will be. Also unclear is how much access and to what, exactly, the governments of the Five Eyes are proposing. However, it seems likely that the least it would allow each government is access to encrypted call and message data relating to their citizens.
    Given that Facebook has been breaching our privacy in favor of government agencies for a long time now, you can rest assured that Zuckerberg will not put up any meaningful resistance to this new decree issued by the Five Eyes network.
    This idea of „fake news“ and still-unsubstantiated claims of extensive foreign interference in Western democracies more or less set the tone for the Five Eyes gathering in Australia. Perhaps, just perhaps, the aim of these governments was not to discuss what to do about child-trafficking or international crime as they claim, but actually something more broadly related to containing these powers‘ number-one adversary (here are two clues).

    It is worth noting that there has been next to no criticism of these Five Eyes powers for delivering such a blatant attack on our right to privacy. Remember that, of course, Russian President Vladimir Putin is attempting to „wrest control of the internet,“ as the Guardian wrote approximately three years ago. But these same Western media companies are awkwardly silent about what their own governments are proposing to do, something which other nations could only dream about achieving on such a global scale.
    It needs to be said that now is the time to start paying attention. If you think the same governments that facilitate terrorism all over the planet want to access your data to in good faith to do nothing other than foil terrorist plots, you are nothing short of naïve.
    Privacy matters, whether you think you matter or not; and if you don’t believe me, who better to demonstrate this point than Mark Zuckerberg himself?
    „This same division can be seen with the CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, who in an infamous interview in 2010 pronounced that privacy is no longer a ’social norm,’“ journalist Glenn Greenwald noted in his TEDtalk, „Why Privacy Matters.“
    „Last year, Mark Zuckerberg and his new wife purchased not only their own house but also all four adjacent houses in Palo Alto for a total of $30 million in order to ensure that they enjoyed a zone of privacy that prevented other people from monitoring what they do in their personal lives,“ Greenwald continued.
    So, why does all of this matter anyway? If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, am I right?
    Firstly, security researchers and other critics of these backdoor access proposals have stated time and time again that there is no workable way to create a „secure backdoor“ that would not be vulnerable to intercept by hackers who have not been sanctioned access to the data.
    Secondly, this line of nonsensical thinking was graciously debunked and tossed into the fire, never to be seen again, by none other than infamous whistleblower Edward Snowden, who stated:
    „…privacy isn’t about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect. That’s who you are. Privacy is baked into our language, our core concepts of government and self in every way. It’s why we call it ‚private property.‘ Without privacy you don’t have anything for yourself.“
    „Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.“
    For those of us who have plenty to say, the memo is nothing but an attack on all our fundamental rights and freedoms, and should be rejected in the same manner in which the media has chosen to ignore it.
    Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!“
    Source: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/437895-privacy-five-eyes-encryption/

  • Orwell’s 1984 no longer reads like fiction. It’s the reality of our times

    „Orwell’s 1984 no longer reads like fiction. It’s the reality of our times“
    (Getty Images / gremlin)
    „70 years ago, the British writer George Orwell captured the essence of technology in its ability to shape our destinies in his seminal work, 1984. The tragedy of our times is that we have failed to heed his warning. No matter how many times I read 1984, the feeling of total helplessness and despair that weaves itself throughout Orwell’s masterpiece never fails to take me by surprise. Although usually referred to as a ‘dystopian futuristic novel’, it is actually a horror story on a scale far greater than anything that has emerged from the minds of prolific writers like Stephen King or Dean Koontz. The reason is simple. The nightmare world that the protagonist Winston Smith inhabits, a place called Oceania, is all too easily imaginable. Man, as opposed to some imaginary clown or demon, is the evil monster. In the very first pages of the book, Orwell demonstrates an uncanny ability to foresee future trends in technology. Describing the protagonist Winston Smith’s frugal London flat, he mentions an instrument called a ‘telescreen’, which sounds strikingly similar to the handheld ‘smartphone’ that is enthusiastically used by billions of people around the world today.
    „Orwell describes the ubiquitous device as an “oblong metal plaque like a dulled mirror” affixed to the wall that “could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely.” Sound familiar? It is through this gadget that the rulers of Oceania are able to monitor the actions of its citizens every minute of every day. At the same time, the denizens of 1984 were never allowed to forget they were living in a totalitarian surveillance state, under the control of the much-feared Thought Police. Massive posters with the slogan ‘Big Brother is Watching You’ were as prevalent as our modern-day advertising billboards. Today, however, such polite warnings about surveillance would seem redundant, as reports of unauthorized spying still gets the occasional lazy nod in the media now and then.“
    „In fact, just in time for 1984’s anniversary, it has been reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) has once again been illicitly collecting records on telephone calls and text messages placed by US citizens. This latest invasion of privacy has been casually dismissed as an “error” after an unnamed telecommunications firm handed over call records the NSA allegedly “hadn’t requested” and “weren’t approved” by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. In 2013, former CIA employee Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the NSA’s intrusive surveillance operations, yet somehow the government agency is able to continue – with the help of the corporate sector – vacuuming up the private information of regular citizens.“
    „Another method of control alluded to in 1984 fell under a system of speech known as ‘Newspeak’, which attempted to reduce the language to ‘doublethink’, with the ulterior motive of controlling ideas and thoughts. For example, the term ‘joycamp’, a truncated term every bit as euphemistic as the ‘PATRIOT Act’, was used to describe a forced labor camp, whereas a ‘doubleplusgood duckspeaker’ was used to praise an orator who ‘quacked’ correctly with regards to the political situation.
    Another Newspeak term, known as ‘facecrime’, provides yet another striking parallel to our modern situation. Defined as “to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offense.” It would be difficult for the modern reader to hear the term ‘facecrime’ and not connect it with ‘Facebook’, the social media platform that regularly censors content creators for expressing thoughts it finds ‘hateful’ or inappropriate. What social media users need is an Orwellian lesson in ‘crimestop’, which Orwell defined as “the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought.” Those so-called unacceptable ‘dangerous thoughts’ were determined not by the will of the people, of course, but by their rulers.
    And yes, it gets worse. Just this week, Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘private company’ agreed to give French authorities the “identification data” of Facebook users suspected of spreading ‘hate speech’ on the platform, in what would be an unprecedented move on the part of Silicon Valley.
    ‘Hate speech’ is precisely one of those delightfully vague, subjective terms with no real meaning that one would expect to find in the Newspeak style guide. Short of threatening the life of a person or persons, individuals should be free to criticize others without fear of reprisal, least of all from the state, which should be in the business of protecting free speech at all cost.“
    „Another modern phenomenon that would be right at home in Orwell’s Oceania is the obsession with political correctness, which is defined as “the avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.” But since so many people today identify with some marginalized group, this has made the intelligent discussion of controversial ideas – not least of all on US college campuses, of all places – exceedingly difficult, if not downright dangerous. Orwell must be looking down on all of this madness with much surprise, since he provided the world with the best possible warning to prevent it.
    For anyone who entertains expectations for a happy ending in 1984, be prepared for serious disappointment (spoiler alert, for the few who have somehow not read this book). Although Winston Smith manages to finally experience love, the brief romance – like a delicate flower that was able to take root amid a field of asphalt – is crushed by the authorities with shocking brutality. Not satisfied with merely destroying the relationship, however, Smith is forced to betray his ‘Julia’ after undergoing the worst imaginable torture at the ‘Ministry of Love’.
    The book ends with the words, “He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.” Will we too declare, like Winston Smith, our love for ‘Big Brother’ above all else, or will we emerge victorious against the forces of a technological tyranny that appears to be just over the horizon? Or is Orwell’s 1984 just really good fiction and not the instruction manual for tyrants many have come to fear it is?
    An awful lot is riding on our answers to those questions, and time is running out.
    @Robert_Bridge“
    Source: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462924-george-orwell-1984-70/

  • Genocide Treaty – Deborah Tavares

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKEGUKvo4vk
    „GENOCIDE TREATY WAS SIGNED BY USA INC. IN 1988. RUSSIA SIGNED GENOCIDE TREATY IN 1949.
    GENOCIDE TREATY IS THE MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN 96 GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD.
    WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED. KILLING OF ENTIRE POPULATIONS HAPPENING NOW!“
    „I want to talk to you further about the genocide treaty this is imperative and it’s built and based upon the fundamental understanding that we do not have a government we need to all
    understand that we are in a warfare called attrition the action or process of gradually reducing the strength and effectiveness of someone or something through sustained attacks or pressure
    that’s what we are all confronting now with the weaponized weather assaults all over the world and we are going to get
    into more of that after I continue with the genocide treaty.“
    „We have actors in place, in political levels that appear to look like a functioning government and of course it’s not, the treaty was quickly signed by the very nations that are practicing genocide on day to day basis, again a list of the signatures of the Genocide treaty reveals that it includes
    the leading practitioners of post-world War two genocide and those that have signed this are from Albania, Bulgaria,
    Red China, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Vietnam and the Soviet Union and more, no American citizen or resident alien legal or otherwise is excluded from the sweep of this article in this treaty as for the enumerated crimes killing of the group does not allow for any legal defense, this is why there is
    no admission to the Chemtrailing and all the poisons and toxins and viruses that are being spread on us this is why there
    is no recourse for the vaccination program I want to add at this point that it’s important to understand with the 5g
    network coming in that dormant viruses that we have been vaccinated with or at least those that have chosen to be
    vaccinated with will be activated by frequencies we’re going to see many illnesses globally from the vaccination programs but the Genocide treaty goes on to say that causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of a group.“

  • "David Icke ~ "Mind Control / Censorship / Multi-Dimensionality"


    „David Icke ~ „Mind Control / Censorship / Multi-Dimensionality“
    „>>>>>>>>>>> Mind Control Everyone >>>>> by 2030“
    „You see there will be wifi in this room and yet where is it?
    If you said to someone who knows nothing about computers there is a field of energy in this room. Which you can tap into anywhere in this world and tap into this great global reality we call the Internet the world wide web – If you didn’t know about computers – they would say you are crazy. Your mad – I Can’t see it so it Can’t exist. To someone who knows about computers he’d say „Yeah I know all about that“ You see the only difference is knowledge! Which is fundamental to peoples perceptions including life.
    This end game is to go directly to the mind.
    Every thought every emotional state, everything will be fed to us. Directly to the mind. By 2030!
    The human mind becomes like a computer terminal on someone else’s Internet. We´ve got to realize what is happening.
    All this stuff with 5G. It´s a frequency level that a power of communicative energy information. That is necessary for this mind control grid to opperate. This is why they are upping it more and more powerful and more and more dangerous for the
    Human body. And why this 5g is being rolled out without any testing whatsoever. A.I. Connected to the human mind – the human mind is finished – that is the end game.“

  • Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police

    „Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police“
    „Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard“
    „Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent.
    Operation Tiberius, written in 2002, found underworld syndicates used their contacts in the controversial brotherhood to “recruit corrupted officers” inside Scotland Yard, and concluded it was one of “the most difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”.
    The report – marked “Secret” – found serving officers in East Ham east London who were members of the Freemasons attempted to find out which detectives were suspected of links to organised crime from other police sources who were also members of the society.
    Famous for its secret handshakes, Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police.
    The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists. However, Operation Tiberius is the second secret police report revealed by The Independent in the last six months to highlight the possible issue.
    Project Riverside, a 2008 report on the rogue private investigations industry by the Serious Organised Crime Agency, also claimed criminals attempt to corrupt police officers through Freemason members in a bid to further their interests.
    Concerns over the influence of freemasons on the criminal justice system in 1998 led former Home Secretary Jack Straw to order that all police officers and judges should declare membership of the organisation.
    However, ten of Britain’s 43 police forces refused to take part and the policy was dropped under threat of legal action. In England and Wales, the Grand Master of the Freemasons is Prince Edward, Duke of Kent. The United Grand Lodge of England declined to comment last night.
    The Independent revealed last week that Operation Tiberius found that organised crime syndicates such as the Adams family and the gang led by David Hunt were able to infiltrate the Met “at will”.
    Asked to comment on the Tiberius report, a spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “The Metropolitan Police Service will not tolerate any behaviour by our officers and staff which could damage the trust placed in police by the public.
    “We are determined to pursue corruption in all its forms and with all possible vigour.”“
    Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/revealed-how-gangs-used-the-freemasons-to-corrupt-police-9054670.html

  • William Shatner Exposes the Organized Stalking of Cheryl Welsh on The History Channel

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lha3iBRAw0A
    „William Shatner Exposes the Organized Stalking of Cheryl Welsh on The History Channel“
    „Thought Justice
    Am 09.05.2019 veröffentlicht
    This video is part of my Medium article that presents evidence of Californians who have become subjected to organized stalking: https://medium.com/@thomas.mcfarlan/t…“